• steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    60 seconds ago

    I had a different post that didn’t really answer your question. A real answer is that it might not be as much of a problem as you might imagine. Biometric verification is really insecure: something like a 1% false positive rate for fingerprints.

    Ideally people would just use passwords like back in the olden days. Longer strings are more secure than random characters.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago
    • fingerprints are not genetic, but are formed by the movement of the fetus in the womb. while they are not a reliable way to identify someone out of a general population (the likeness is about 1:10000; there have been wrongful convictions based off of fingerprint data) they can be used to differentiate two individuals.
    • almost everyone has some insignificant scarring on the hands or face that’s created after birth and which is tied to some stupid story about cutting cheese or whatever.
    • everyone has some weird fetish. if you don’t think your fetish is weird, it’s because you’re in company that shares it.
  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    My doppelganger will provide PII before I do

    Whichever one folds and tells you an actual identifying characteristic first is the fake

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      The inquisitor sighs in exasperation.

      “It’s been 36 hours. You’ve each had one granola bar and a bottle of Pepsi since you got here. At some point, one of you has to prove you’re real.”

      Left Starman says “I invoke the 5th.”

      Right Starman says “I want a lawyer.”

      "You’re not under arrest! We’re just trying to figure out which one of you is real. You gotta give us something.

      Both Starmen simultaneously state “I don’t talk to police.”

      The interrogation continues for a further 17 hours before Left Starman gives in. “My cat’s name is Iris, you can call my roommates and verify it.”

      “You dumb son of a bitch,” Right Starman says, “that’s just what I tell people online.”

      BLAM

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve had several occasions where I’ve seen doppelgangers out in public in my city but I’m 99% sure this is because I was a sperm donor baby. It was totally anonymous in the early 90s.

    Could do one of those DNA test things but I have less than 0 interest in meeting a bunch of half siblings. Sounds messy. Already got two parents who I’m happy with.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You authenticate either with something that you have (physical key, for example), something that you know (passwor for example), or something that you are (biometrics, basically).

    Dopplegangers rule out that last one, but the previous two still work fine

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “Something you have” is not exactly a good way to authenticate. Once they steal it, they can assume your identity (see: ID Theft)

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That also goes for what you are. Biometric security has been rendered nearly useless since everybody and their mother started using it without giving a single shit about securing that data

  • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m already an identical twin and it’s a nightmare even having a different first and middle name but same everything else.

    I think we’re just living with a second set of identical twins?

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Some years back I was in a D&D campaign where doppelgangers became a major ongoing concern. It turned out that in that case doppelgangers built up their image of the person they wanted to mimic through careful observation, but thanks to the general prudishness of society doppelgangers rarely ever caught glimpses of peoples’ genitals. So we ultimately came up with the “crotch check” system. Doppelgangers usually couldn’t form plausible genitalia.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Does my doppelgänger go to my workplace and do my job?

    If not, there’s your answer.

    If he does, I leave him to it and go read a book in the park.

  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Same as I do now, passwords. Unless they inherited my memories, in which case who’s to say I’m not the doppelganger?

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Lol, I think passwords are very trival to get.

      I mean, they got the ability to look like you, you gotta assume they can get CCTV footage of you typing your passwords.

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I don’t see how looking like me would help them get CCTV footage, unless it’s through some sort of supernatural means. And even if they could find footage of me entering a password, they’d be hard-pressed to extract individual keystrokes from a typical CCTV quality recording. Perhaps it’s technically possible, but it’s certainly not trivial.

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’d sign a payload using my private key that my doppelganger doesn’t have.