“with wind the single-biggest contributor… Power production costs have declined “by almost half” … And the clean energy sector has created 50,000 new jobs… Ask me what was the impact on the electricity sector in Uruguay after this tragic war in Europe — zero.”

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually never thought of it like that, if you’re not partaking in the trade of fossil fuels, you are removing yourself from a lot of potential conflicts and “who support who” ordeals.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the main reasons the big players want (or even need) as many people globally to remain dependent on it as possible - control.

        • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Germany has the most renewables per capita of any European nation and have been heavy investors for a long time now.

          • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They are a bit better now, but especially during Merkel were some heavy stones laid on the way for wind. Ok, i admit, they are good in private solar now.

        • puppy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ironically it’s the US and German subsidies that kickstarted solar and brought costs down.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I think that one of the side effect of the war in Ukraine will be a big increase of renewables energy in Europe.

      European countries started to realize how fragile their energy supply is and how dangerous it is.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sadly, in the meantime it also mean a surge of imports of fossil fuels from other countries and reopening extraction sites in EU. Reducing fossil fuel dependency really is the top priority of EU, not only for ecology but also for peace and for the economy.

      • Hoagie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except once you have the turbines and panels, you don’t have to keep importing resources to run them. Sure, you might need parts for maintenance, but if things go south it’s a lot easier to reverse engineer parts than to find new oil suppliers.

      • AAA@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only because they produce them the cheapest and in the largest quantities (which goes hand in hand).

        Basically any country can produce solar panels and wind turbines. Both technology and resource wise.