Similar to the recent question about artists where you can successfully separate them from their art. Are there any artists who did something so horrible, so despicable, that it has instantly invalidated all art that they have had any part in?

  • blunderworld@lemmy.caEnglish
    1511·
    11 months ago

    As opposed to what, consensually making love to them? What an unnecessary distinction.

    • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      97·
      11 months ago

      The point is that we should try to stop using euphemistic language around rape. It happens all the time, and it lessens the impact of the act for the reader. We should be explicit.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      1117·
      11 months ago

      You mean the distinction between engaging in consensual intercourse (aka “fucking”) vs committing a heinous crime?

      If you think pointing out that babies can only be raped, is the problem, not saying he “fucked” them, this is a you problem…

      • blunderworld@lemmy.caEnglish
        183·
        11 months ago

        I’m saying the fact that its non-consensual sex (aka rape) is inherent to the scenario. A baby can’t consent to, nor understand, the concept of sex. So I guess I’m just not sure what point you’re trying to make in splitting hairs.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          422·
          11 months ago

          I’m making the point that babies cannot be fucked, only raped, which obviously isn’t “inherent” to the person who said “he fucked babies” which minimises the reality of the “scenario” as you call it (more minimisation, why do you do that? To preserve your own comfort of course!). Words matter, and if you think pointing that out is “splitting hairs” (when you’re literally the only one making a load of fuss over this valid distinction), then again, you’re the one with the problem here (and taking issue with someone pointed out that babies can only be raped, not “fucked” is definitely a problem that needs addressing, like seriously - imagine being the person dying on the hill to defend the use of “fucked” to describe baby rape… 🤦‍♀️).

          • blunderworld@lemmy.caEnglish
            155·
            11 months ago

            Damn, you are shooketh. Not used to anyone suggesting your point may not be as profound as you thought, I guess.

            Take a breather, It’ll all be okay.

          • blazeknave@lemmy.world
            12·
            11 months ago

            Lemmy sucks. This isn’t a you thing. Nobody IRL would ever spend the energy debating you on this. And of course a follow-up of “whoa relax don’t get triggered bro”

            There is no understanding that words matter round these parts at all. This place is a dangerous bubble bc it started as a place where one assumed everyone was on the level. So if you were the outlier opinion, maybe it really was you: I’d challenge myself and question my opinions. Now, if I’m downvoted, I dig in and entrench.