• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Sure. If it fills a gap in my model, I don’t need any proof at all. Why would I? It just makes sense. Of course I’m going to tentatively fit it in

    And if a study convincingly disproves it, I’ll just as quickly discard the tentative idea. Why wouldn’t I? It made sense, but it didn’t math out.

    But this is all in the context of my model. It’s a big web of corroboration

    You can’t convince me global warming isn’t happening, because I’m watching it in real time. No amount of studies are doing to do more than inform the facts of my lived experience… I’m the primary source, I was there

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What if you wake up from the Matrix and it turns out the world actually descended into an ice age?

      I mean, it’s a silly, kinda extreme scenario, but we’re talking about big picture stuff and you can’t ever convince me would cover it as well.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Oh, that would fit in my model perfectly. Because it’s another world… Obviously. My model isn’t disproven if I wake up in another world, my model is just physically removed from my new world. Universal things still apply until they don’t, but there’s no conflict

        If global warming hits 2.5C then flips around to an ice age…I don’t understand it, but it’s happened. My old observations aren’t disproven, new ones disprove the theories around them

        Squaring that circle would take effort, but if it’s true it’s true, and truth sometimes takes time to understand