This phone is broken (broken screen) and was given to me, so I figured I’d use it as a WiFi extender, but I guess I can’t.

  • forrgott@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Well, technically that’s not a “hotspot”. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ it’s a Wi-Fi extender.

    • kernelle@0d.gs
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ll have to disagree on that one, WiFi extenders extend an existing network, keeping the same network and DHCP is done by the original access point.

      A hotspot creates a new network, and DHCP is handled by the hotspot, not the network on the WAN side.

    • m-p{3}@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And a poor Wi-Fi extender as well, since you halve your network bandwidth by using an extender with a single radio chip.

      • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’ve only seen that option on phones with two radios, it uses the 2.4GHz radio for one connection and the 5GHz radio for the other

        • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I am not entirely sure what kind of radio fuckery happens, but my phone (Oneplus 6 with LineageOS) can be connected to a 5 Ghz wifi network and have a 5 GHz hotspot open at the same time.

          I am assuming the wifi chip has two (or more) somewhat independent frontends, since my home wifi and the phone hotspot are on two different 5 GHz frequencies.

        • forrgott@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          That’s kinda required. I doubt one antenna can simultaneously send and receive.

          Anyway, there’s still only one controller, so your bandwidth is still halved.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I am not sure if the bandwidth is really limited by the controller, or by the modulation / signal-to-noise ratios in practical scenarios.

            • forrgott@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Oh, I should clarify; this is more than send and receive - there’s some amount of network routing involved with being a Wi-Fi extender or relay or whatever.

              What I probably meant to say is one antenna cannot send/receive simultaneously on more than one network.

              But, yes, duh, thank you for calling me out on that one!