Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 4 days agoWhat is a human behaviour you've never understood?message-squaremessage-square342fedilinkarrow-up1178arrow-down17
arrow-up1171arrow-down1message-squareWhat is a human behaviour you've never understood?Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square342fedilink
minus-squareCount Regal Inkwell@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days ago Eating bugs. Unless they’re wet bugs. Then it’s fine dining. /s Seriously, people retch at the idea of chomping down on a cricket, a “clean” bug, but then get all excited about eating shrimp, which is like a sea Cockroach.
minus-squareKbobabob@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·3 days agoThat’s not a human behavior imo
minus-squaregazter@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoI guess it depends on how you define human, and bugs. Insects have been, and continue to be, part of the homo sapien diet for millennia. However, there’s a pretty strong argument that choosing to cause less suffering by not eating animals is a more human approach.
minus-squareAnti_Iridium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoI was about to say, doesn’t the FDA have a maximum allowed amount of cockroach per jar of peanut butter?
minus-squaregazter@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoI think intent would count for a lot here.
Eating bugs.
Unless they’re wet bugs. Then it’s fine dining. /s
Seriously, people retch at the idea of chomping down on a cricket, a “clean” bug, but then get all excited about eating shrimp, which is like a sea Cockroach.
That’s not a human behavior imo
I guess it depends on how you define human, and bugs.
Insects have been, and continue to be, part of the homo sapien diet for millennia.
However, there’s a pretty strong argument that choosing to cause less suffering by not eating animals is a more human approach.
I was about to say, doesn’t the FDA have a maximum allowed amount of cockroach per jar of peanut butter?
I think intent would count for a lot here.