If you click disagree, the site just doesn’t work at all. Instead, gadgethacks.com shows you this.

image

You know, normal sites make you accept the bare minimum that is required for the site to function, and give you an option to accept or reject all the tracking cancer and advertising plague.

  • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    In Spain most of news webs have been doing this more than a year. You can choose between accepting cookies or paying a monthly subscription to refuse cookies. They say that the EU law doesn’t say that the option to refuse cookies has to be free, although Facebook was fined for doing exactly that recently. So, yeah…

    In most of them what works is disabling JavaScript scripts execution.

    • black0ut@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have an extension that lets me block sites from search results. Half the spanish news sites are blocked, because I’m tired of seeing an interesting result, clicking on it, not being able to refuse cookies and having to go back.

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s genuinely been infuriating. Typically, if a page asks me to accept cookies for their “1500 partners” i just decline it and block the site, but a lot of the Spanish news aggregates want 8€ a month before they let you view the page at all

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh it’s JavaScript again. Seems like that’s the root cause and solution to most web related problems these days.

    • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes, but Facebook was fined because they are too big to avoid. Under the dma is I remember correctly, not the gdpr.