You had one job…

      • berkeleyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        8 months ago

        The bigger issue is that the US still alows Blinkers to be the same color as break lights. Just weird to me.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Actually, Us law/regulations require them to be amber or yellow.

          But like with super-bright headlamps; manufacturers decided to ignore it because USDoT is pretty useless in that regard.

          • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s not correct. FMVSS 108, Table I-a, specifically allows rear turn signals to be amber or red. Front turn signals must be amber only.

      • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        I guess… It’s still a big blinking light on either side of the car I hardly think it’s going to confuse anyone

        • Clasm@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Have you seen the idiots out on the road these days?

          However, as far as turn signals go, this is one of the less egregious designs. Car manufacturers are given too much leeway in what is allowed for such systems, like putting them between headlights or making them use the same circuits as the brake lights instead of a dedicated light.

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, I could see it being an issue for some less-common type of indicator, but everyone who drives knows what a blinker looks like. Nobody would mistake it for anything other than the right hand turn signal.

          Hell, I wouldn’t even notice the shape of the light; all you need to notice while driving is the presence of a flashing light on the right side of the vehicle - if you’re looking intently enough to notice the shape of the light, you’re not paying enough attention to everything else on the road.

          • Slotos@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            In the dark, with the other side obscured (or just broken), you don’t want the blinker to actively prompt you to come to a wrong conclusion.

            It’s better to see a blinking light and think “I don’t see enough, gotta slow down” than see a blinking arrow and potentially not even realize it’s a turn signal.

            • Signtist@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              If you’re driving in the dark with someone whose entire taillight system is out to the point where you can’t immediately tell if his blinker is on the left or the right, you need to hit the brakes and put as much distance between you and them as you can… Then get better headlights, because even in that situation you should still be able to see them pretty well just with your own lights.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Frequently, only a single bulb needs to be out for an entire side of the car to be dark.

                Brakelights are only active while braking. A dark bodied car is difficult to see and a tail light being out is sufficient .

                Blaming it on someone else’s headlights isn’t reasonable- and “better headlights”=brighter has caused significant problems on the other direction.

                It’s a mild issue that could have been solved by a designer spending 30 seconds thinking about what they were designing. Or somebody in that design chain spending 30 seconds thinking about it.

                • Signtist@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Dude, if your headlights aren’t enough to illuminate what’s in front of you, then it’s not that an upgrade would be too much, it’s that an upgrade would get you to the bare minimum… You literally NEED to be able to see what else is on the road with you at ALL TIMES. You’re complaining about the risk that a vaguely arrow-shaped blinker causes in the specific case where you literally can’t see the car it’s attached to. There’s a much bigger risk there, and while it’s not your fault, it’s definitely something your vehicle needs to have the tools to deal with.

                  There have been times where I was driving near someone who forgot to turn their headlights on at night. But that’s the thing - I knew they were there; I could see their car with the light from my headlights, and even in that dangerously-low vision, I could easy tell which side of their car a blinker came on from. Yes, I got off the road and waited a bit to make sure they weren’t near me anymore, but even in the time that I had to drive with them, I had the tools to resolve the situation safely for me.

                  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Dude, if your headlights aren’t enough to illuminate what’s in front of you, then it’s not that an upgrade would be too much, it’s that an upgrade would get you to the bare minimum… You literally NEED to be able to see what else is on the road with you at ALL TIMES. You’re complaining about the risk that a vaguely arrow-shaped blinker causes in the specific case where you literally can’t see the car it’s attached to. There’s a much bigger risk there, and while it’s not your fault, it’s definitely something your vehicle needs to have the tools to deal with.

                    duuudeeee… you realize, of course, that it’s a least as much a question of alignment… and with a car in front of you you shouldn’t be using floodlights; which is blinding everyone in front of you. Which is as likely to cause problems as not.

                    Further, dark colors on cars are inherently harder to see, lights or no.

                    There have been times where I was driving near someone who forgot to turn their headlights on at night. But that’s the thing - I knew they were there; I could see their car with the light from my headlights, and even in that dangerously-low vision, I could easy tell which side of their car a blinker came on from. Yes, I got off the road and waited a bit to make sure they weren’t near me anymore, but even in the time that I had to drive with them, I had the tools to resolve the situation safely for me.

                    Good for you. Doesn’t mean the situation can’t arise where it is a problem. Stop defending idiots that put cool-factor before functionality on something that’s fundamentally meant as a safety feature. save the cool-factor for the union jack roof paint or something.

        • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Now imagine it in, say, fog, or a storm, or any other low-visibility condition. You can see the vague outline of a car 20 feet ahead, and a blinking arrow pointing to the right, but not in line with where a right blinker should be.

          • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If visibility was that low then you wouldn’t even see an arrow. It would just look like a red blinking blob up ahead.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      Multiple wrong. The brake light double as a turn signal, the signal colour itself being red, and the arrow pointing at different direction.

      In a saner world, signal and brake light will always be separated and must be the colour of amber.

    • exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s the right turning light… In the shape of an arrow pointing left