Doesn’t actually say that 60k overheated his drive. He says that he ran a run on 60k, and that he couldn’t do the whole database due to overheating. Two unrelated statements except that 60k is the lower bound for what he could process.
Doesn’t mean he knows what he’s doing though, as pretty huge datasets are processable on quite modest hardware if you do it right.
Sadly this comes down to OpenAI petitioning Trump, and expecting trump to do anything that could stop a scam like AI is pointless.
That 20% though…you want that to be physical.
Same as BMW iDrive. I’m sure some are touch screen, but you don’t have to use it.
Physical controls don’t change this.
More coding?! Are you serious? Over a touch screen!
Also, extremely easy to test.
Saying KHTML = WebKit is like saying a sponge is a killer whale.
…except they don’t for their own browser.
That’s not a flaw. That’s a right to repair requirement.
Yes, yes and yes, but it’ll take a while. It’s a six year project overall.
deleted by creator
If you want to avoid giving people rights that are meant to apply to all humans, you are doing something very wrong.
I doubt Trump will be alive when those fabs come online. It takes years. In the meantime he’ll place tariffs on technology imports without having the alternative domestic production.
as it’s spelled: im gur.
“I’m gur”?
Tony… Is that you?
Long term due to maintenance…sure
…but today we have all we need to launch a strike.
…three hours later.
“You are a very tough negotiator… I’m not sure I like that, but okay,” Trump told Sir Keir as they appeared before reporters after their meeting. And he did not seem to be entirely joking.
That paragraph is crucial back home. Many will criticise Starmer for being all smile with Trump in front of the camera. Many would have preferred to have seen him trying to pin Trump down, but at least it sounds like that happened behind closed doors.
There’s been been bills at the EU level, but they’ve been defeated. I think individual countries introduced their own bills if they were supporters of the EU one.
I don’t really understand this.
The subs are British and are commanded by Royal Navy Officers. They can launch autonomously as target sites autonomously as that’s the whole point of the UKs deterent, to operate after first strike has occurred and all friendly infrastructure / command structure has been destroyed.
A RN officer will not take orders from a US officer, so how is Trident sub or weapon under control of the US?
For those that didn’t see it…