- 0 Posts
- 127 Comments
The obstacles serve a specific purpose though. Do you believe this purpose is unimportant?
How difficult is it to communicate to others without letting your ego get in the way? I swear, you people act like literal children sometimes haha
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•The largest cryptocurrency money-laundering ringEnglish
2·10 months agoGot it. Thanks
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•The largest cryptocurrency money-laundering ringEnglish
2·10 months agoWhat would you consider proper attribution?
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•You probably don't remember these but I have a questionEnglish
1·10 months agoLow power. Only picks up your cars receiver, and potentially neighboring vehicles temporarily if they are receiving at the same frequency.
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•Duolingo CEO says AI is a better teacher than humans—but schools will exist ‘because you still need childcare’English
5·11 months agoYou can’t do anything alone. Isolation will be the downfall of society as we know it. I hope AI isn’t leading us in that path
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What are you most basic principles for life?
1·11 months agoBe kind to others and let go of attachments. Have lived a very happy and successful life by doing just those two things.
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•A Judge Accepted AI Video Testimony From a Dead ManEnglish
18·11 months agoOmg I hate this so much fuck you
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•A Deadly Love Affair with a Chatbot ∣ Sewell Setzer was a happy child - before he fell in love with Google's AI chatbot and took his own life at 14.English
3516·11 months agoYou’re acting as if the bot had some sort of intention to help him. It’s a bot. It has zero intention whatsoever since it’s not a conscious entity. It is programmed to respond to an input. That’s it.
The larger picture here is that this technology is being used by people in a way that’s being used as if it were a conscious entity. Including the mentally ill. Which is very dangerous, and can drive people to action as we can see.
That’s not to say I have any idea how to handle this. Because I don’t have a clue. But it is a discussion that needs to be had rather than minimizing the situation as an “well the bot actually tried to talk him out of suicide”, because in my opinion that’s not the point. We are interacting with this technology in a way that is changing our own behavior and world view. And it is causing real world harm like this.
When we make something so believable as to trick people into thinking that they’re interacting with consciousness, that is a giant alarm we must discuss. Because at the end of the day, it’s a technology that can be owned, controlled, and manipulated by the owner class to serve their needs of maintaining power.
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•Microsoft fires employee protestor who called AI boss a ‘war profiteer’English
2·1 year agoEthical options?
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•Microsoft fires employee protestor who called AI boss a ‘war profiteer’English
6·1 year agoProblems can be ongoing or increase in severity. Just because it’s been an issue for a while doesn’t mean it’s too late for change.
Also, some people don’t have the luxury to choose an ethical employer (if they even exist).
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•I'm an American software developer and the "broligarchs" don't speak for me - ratfactorEnglish
111·1 year agoWho also have absolutely ZERO moral compass. Like literally don’t give two shits if they’re coding a piece of software going into a baby killing machines.
underwire212@lemm.eeto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Don't blame Satan if things don't work out. It's God's plan right?
57·1 year agoI’m not necessarily disagreeing with you here, but thought I’d provide a counter argument.
A group of children are dying of a horrible, deadly disease that can only be cured with the bark from a specific tree. So we go into the forest and chop this tree down to save the children from an excruciating disease.
A squirrel had built its entire home in that tree. That tree was everything to the squirrel. Now the squirrel has nothing and will suffer because we chopped down its home.
How do we explain this to the squirrel? Well, we can’t. No matter how hard we try, we can’t explain why we needed to destroy its home. The squirrel is physically incapable of understanding.
Playing devils advocate here, perhaps the reason for the need for human suffering is so beyond our understanding and comprehension that we are just physically incapable of understanding. Maybe we’re just squirrels, and human suffering needs to happen for some greater purpose unbeknownst to us.
This is great advice for anyone tbh.
What do you even mean by this?
Have you tried talking to him about your feelings?
What’s regular?