It’s it better than organic maps?

True, I do find it mildly infuriating that someone is mildly infuriated at this

Security professional here too. Agree that this is reasonable, and making a big deal about it is kinda meh.

Invasion is good?

This describes the rabbit holes that programmers I work with go down and never come out very well

In this case, a VPN only offers obscuring that you are connecting to the dns over http end point.

The steam deck is amazing. It’s better than the switch because you can do so much more with it. Gaming laptop? Dunno, that is different, you will get better graphics I guess, but the form factor of the deck is great.

I wish they works ask more about desktop, so many issues, lack of feature parity, yet most frequently used, by me

Steam deck!

The difference is who pays the markup. Amazon charges that to the seller, and passes that “discount” to the buyer effectively locking in buyers because nobody else can afford to compete

Not just updates, you need to periodically poll for messages as well, anyone who runs signal-cli runs into these issues

You will likely need to update every two weeks or it will stop working

Not true, I just tried to sign up:

Appears to be optional, if you don’t want to use a phone number.

My experience with contributing to gitlab has actually not been as you describe. Fairly fast responses, obviously targeted releases so I knew when to try and finish any Mr adjustments, bots that provided excellent aid and even ability to ask for subsystem specialist help, when CI shot out confusing errors that appeared unrelated. Frankly, I was impressed. I understand not every feature or bug would go this way, but if you follow their guidelines, get product road map positioning, it works. The amount of commits going in to main are incredible. The number of MRs they handle is equally impressive.

All of that said, I’ve still got issues in gitlab that are seven+ years old, without any movement. But I get it that they have to prioritize and contributions are a different story.

Correct

To be fair it calls usenet the original gangster

Because although there are a lot of usenet clients, there is no Sync for usenet

No offense to the fediverse, but I think usenet was first

This is what bothers me about Mozilla. They position themselves in the privacy space, but thus far their efforts there have not been shown in their actual browser, and only in what I would call clever “green washing” or “privacy washing”. That is why things like Mullvad browser have a market, because the people who actually care about privacy and have spent time to look at what Firefox actually provides in that respect, are not particularly impressed with their “privacy” stance being realized in their product. While I applaud Mozilla for putting this article out there, as it is beneficial to raise awareness about this issue, I wish they would put as much effort into the actual privacy of Firefox as they do in their marketing around it.

I think it would be a worthwhile research project to find out how many users just click through these, accepting what the website wants you to accept by default. It effectively operates like a EULA for every single website, which produces overall fatigue and lack of care. When you’ve visited 20 sites in one day, you just start being irritated by having to constantly make a decision before you can view any content, and just mash whatever button you need to proceed.