Definitely doesn’t sound like an issue with Tor Browser in Strict Mode. /s
- 0 Posts
- 8 Comments
teotwaki@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•DOOGEE Blade 10 Ultra Review: A Sleek, Rugged Powerhouse With Impressive Storage And DurabilityEnglish7·9 months agoThe simple fact that buying a $300 device and to “not expect software updates” is not considered a scam is hilarious to me.
teotwaki@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Users ditch Glassdoor, stunned by site adding real names without consentEnglish42·1 year agoYou didn’t get laid off because you discussed your wages.
You were laid off because you couldn’t keep your cards close to your chest and told the company y’all had been discussing wages.
Having the right to discuss it doesn’t mean you should do it in front of the boss.
teotwaki@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Users ditch Glassdoor, stunned by site adding real names without consentEnglish7·1 year agoIn Denmark, I’m part of a union which publishes salary stats for every possible job title, management responsibility, education, in a fairly convoluted matrix. Still, this allows me to easily negotiate with companies and see how well they pay. There might be something organised by the government, but I’ve never had a need for it.
teotwaki@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Users ditch Glassdoor, stunned by site adding real names without consentEnglish19·1 year agoGermany has a principle of equal treatment. The only way to ensure this is respected is to discuss wages. There is a legal precedent that makes it completely unambiguous that discussing wages is protected. It may be uncomfortable, but that’s just social pressure, encouraged by companies.
teotwaki@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Users ditch Glassdoor, stunned by site adding real names without consentEnglish44·1 year agoYou cannot prevent your employees from discussing wages. It is literally illegal to do so, and you cannot reprimand people for doing so.
Under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or the Act), employees have the right to communicate with their coworkers about their wages, as well as with labor organizations, worker centers, the media, and the public. Wages are a vital term and condition of employment, and discussions of wages are often preliminary to organizing or other actions for mutual aid or protection.
If you are an employee covered by the Act, you may discuss wages in face-to-face conversations, over the phone, and in written messages. Policies that specifically prohibit the discussion of wages are unlawful as are policies that chill employees from discussing their wages.
You may have discussions about wages when not at work, when you are on break, and even during work if employees are permitted to have other non-work conversations. You have these rights whether or not you are represented by a union.
https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/your-rights/your-rights-to-discuss-wages
teotwaki@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Why AI is every businesses' focus right nowEnglish6·1 year agoPedantic moment: “every business’ focus”, or “all businesses’ focus”, but not “every businesses’ focus”.
I’m someone who builds cloud infrastructure for a living. I only touch AWS (Amazon), but the same applies to Azure (Microsoft) and GCP (Google).
Kagi is private. Saying that they “rely” on Google because they use GCP is akin to saying that the US Army relies on General Motors because they use Hummers. It’s just a provider. They’re renting virtual machines, compute power, storage, and network bandwidth nothing more. You can use GCP/Azure/AWS without your data ever being visible by GCP/Azure/AWS. It’s not because you use GCP that you have to use AdSense/Analytics/Fonts, etc. They are completely separate.
Politicians would have a field day with all the cloud providers if using one thing forced you to use everything.