They are unfortunately being used by children, who understandably think they look sick as shit, to murder each other. Here are some “highlights”:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czddg1zvl34o

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-birmingham-66187503

It’s not legal to carry a water pistol full of acid either.

If they’re blunt or made before 1954, you’re good.

yeah, decoration/recreation (or do you want to ban the bow and arrow too? maybe ban boxing gloves?)/historical preservation

Blunt weapons and historical items are not banned per this legislation.

I can’t click those right now, but very much look forward to them. Have one of my favorites:

https://youtu.be/_N66Hud_Tq4

There isn’t one for most people. You just have to go to work or be homeless. Maybe go to school so work is slightly less ass, but even that’s a luxury many can’t afford.

I like to think that that’s actually her, trying to scam us out of money, and I feel a kind of vicarious pride for her as a woman who doesn’t even have to touch a real dick to get paid, while the rest of us chumps are over here with our shitty jobs. Obviously the reality of the situation isn’t great, but in my head she’s a Robin Hood kind of folk hero.

Has is occurred to you that the reason no one is arguing that Biden and Harris aren’t pieces of shit is because they are actually pieces of shit, and no one in this reply chain said otherwise? That’s why “no one said that” was so funny to me.

Ok, but no one here said that.

They literally did though, in those exact words.

There’s lots of bad pacing and horrible acting in movies today though. You can obviously watch or not watch whatever, but I think you’re limiting yourself unnecessarily if you put too much weight on the year of release.

None of that makes any sense. An old book and a new book aren’t different in the way a rotary phone and a smartphone are. They are functionally the same object: text on paper.

You could have, for example, a story about someone stranded on an island, and the era it was written in would make almost no difference at all because technology doesn’t have any bearing on the story, and we haven’t changed as a species. The culture of the author would influence things, but that’s true even of media today since we don’t all share the same culture.

Old media can also be very illuminating when it does affect the story because it can teach you something about the era in which it was made. You might think to yourself, “Gosh, people used to be able to feed and house their families on a single paycheck? Why can’t we do that today?”

And yeah, having stuff in black and white is less visually interesting, but I’m not going to rule out something I might find enjoyable just because of that. I watched quite a few old sitcoms in my childhood that I enjoyed just as much as the modern cartoons, and I still enjoy some of those cartoons today alongside modern TV.

Do you think the Home Alone sequels are better than the original?

Moby Dick is good in a way where I don’t care about any of the characters or the story, but I could read Melville describe water or argue that dolphins are fish for the rest of my life, just because of how beautifully he does it.

I don’t understand that at all. What about being old makes something boring by default?