no. you don’t understand infinity, and you don’t understand probability.

if every keystroke is just as likely as any other keystroke, then each of them will be pressed an infinite number of times. that’s what just as likely means. that’s how random works.

if the monkey could press a for an eternity, then by definition it’s not as likely as any other keystroke. you’re again changing the parameters to a monkey whose probability of pressing a is 1 and every other key is 0. that’s what you’re saying means.

for a monkey that presses the keys randomly, which means the probability of each key is equal, every string of characters will be typed. you can find the letter a typed a million times consecutively, and a billion times and a quadrillion times. not only will you find any number of consecutive keystrokes of every letter, but you will find it repeated an infinite number of times throughout.

being infinite does guarantee every possible outcome. what you’re ruling out from infinity is literally impossible by definition.

this has nothing to do with the matter

why do you keep changing the parameters? yeah, if you exclude the possibility of something happening it won’t happen. duh?

that’s not what’s happening in the infinite monkey theorem. it’s random key presses. that means every character has an equal chance of being pressed.

no one said the monkey would eventually start painting. or even type arabic words. it has a typewriter, presumably an English one. so the results will include every possible string of characters ever.

it’s not a common misconception, you just don’t know what the theorem says at all.

the actual analog isn’t a million monkeys. you only need one monkey. but it’s for an infinite amount of time. the probability isn’t practically zero, it’s one. that’s how infinity works. not only will it happen, but it will happen again, infinitely many times.

Bonnie and Clyde

also the most prominent idolized today isn’t Dahmer; it’s the guy who just got elected for president

this isn’t a regular crime where people online try to crack the case. no one’s looking for him. except maybe cops, which means he’s probably gonna be fine.

wow he picked a silent pistol to not bother people around while doing cleaning. what a considerate guy.

as an outsider I would think no. you don’t have much political force to cultivate this sentiment. democrats are already acting shocked and devastated for their buddies. they’re on the side of ceos, don’t forget. insider trading party can hardly pretend to give a shit about the average person. they will wait for the flame to burn out. return to business as usual: protecting the rich, losing elections and all that.

nope. the right is celebrating too. going by the Facebook post alone, the population of which should already lean right, implying that the left:right ratio is 60:2 is stupid, though not too stupid for a fucking troglodyte.

what the fuck

apparently we won’t because we’re not modular enough

that’s not a Venn diagram

I love that it’s running blender lol

i think you’re not thinking about what efficiency means for corporations.

it won’t if you don’t force it to. that’s like saying companies will pollute less if you give them enough time. no, you have to grab their balls and force them to do it.

YouTube soon to update terms of service to include “We must secure the existence of ads and a future for youtube-watching children”

yes. but don’t worry the brain worm is dead and totally not in control. you would best obey.

deleted by creator

that sounds crazy. that makes the idea of federation pointless imo… thank you for the response

could you elaborate for people who don’t use it?