Furry (feral dhole), he/him, feet/(hind)paw worshipper, car appreciator, mechanical watch wearer, cloud engineer, thinkpad/pop!os!!/i3wm user, occasional synth/guitar/handpan player, car/track enthusiast

Avatar and banner artist: Heatherwolf

Migrated from https://yiffit.net/u/noxy

  • 0 Posts
  • 140 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 16th, 2024

help-circle

  • Admittedly very tough question. Here are some of the ideas I just came up with:

    Make it easier to hold people or organizations liable for mistakes made because of haphazard reliance on LLMs.

    Reparations for everyone ever sued for piracy, and completely do away with intellectual privacy protections for corporations, but independent artists get to keep them.

    Public service announcements campaign aimed at making the general public less trustful of LLMs.

    Strengthen consumer protection such that baseless claims of AI capabilities in advertising or product labeling are legally dangerous to make.

    Fine companies for every verifiably inaccurate result given to a customer or end user by an LLM








  • One of the drivers mentioned in this article has a youtube video showing his odometer going from 124,999 to 125,001, completely skipping 125,000. One of the comments asks him to reach out to the law firm handling the class action lawsuit, but the owner replies with:

    Happy to help if you’re interested in paying a consultation fee for my time-- but otherwise these actions only enrich the law firms and I’m not volunteering to do that.

    This mindset is so frustrating. Class action lawsuits are legit, they hold companies accountable and they pay out cash to people. To say that they only enrich law firms is not just wrong, but I think actually harmful to repeat like he has, especially in the great age of enshittification where everything tries to force binding arbitration agreements into every contract and agreement.