None of that is “Python”. You want to learn a language and automatically know everything there is to know using Math?

That’s as good a reason to go work in space engineering as any.

It would be much better if it stopped missing the version of the code you are working on and locking while starting multithreaded code.

People only discovered that multi-layer non-linear neural networks work at the 90s. It’s not really reasonable to equate perceptrons with the stuff people use today.

When you enter an apostrophe, and the site returns a 500 response stating you are trying to attack it. (And yeah, it’s always 500, not 400.)

It’s quite easy after you learn engineering-level math. It would still require some paper and patience, but it’s not hard.

Only something around 5% of the people go there, but it’s a matter of going there, not being a genius.

is the first in the history where companies own the country

Hum… You need to learn some history.

But i still think C++ has more footguns than Prolog.

They are different kinds of footguns. The C++ ones keep security, ops, management, suppliers, customers, and the public up at night; the prolog ones keep you up at night.

Ouch.

I’ve once decided that “hey, software interaction is logic, so prolog should be the best for complex protocols and UIs!”

Quite soon I understood that no, “complex protocols and UIs” are a problem all by themselves, enabling them makes them worse, and enabling them with prolog makes them even worse.

Up to this day I’m stuck trying to make data quering more “programming-like” than the restrictive thing we have with SQL. I’ve backtracked a few times already after noticing that I just designed prolog again.

But fear not, at some point one of us will finally find that problem domain for what prolog is really suitable. I know of an entire company betting on using it for describing access control rules, maybe they are up to something!

I have been wondering that lately…

Hum… I’m not sure I wouldn’t make that same mistake.

Also, be wary of them kicking boats away at the pier.

Stuff like history, art, and how a fucking analog clock works

Well, I don’t exactly disagree… but one of those things is completely different from the others.

I would agree more if we were talking literally about “how an analog clock works” instead of the convention to reading them. But it would still be a niche knowledge that you can take from Wikipedia if it ever becomes relevant to you.

Kids these days do absolutely still know how to read analog clocks.

Besides, they probably shouldn’t put effort into that. Those things are close to useless nowadays. It’s mostly a case of schools being conservative… but then, it’s not that much of an effort, so there are more important things to care about.

Do you know what “Exchange-Value” represents?

An attempt of pushing some amount of subjectivity into his value theory, but still in a way that keeps it objective and still fails to predict trade.

None of the LTV hold up. For a start, it predicts that people won’t ever trade. That’s quite a big flaw because, you know, people do trade. Theories of value predicting people won’t trade was a big problem by the time Marx was young. His one doesn’t solve the problem at all, but well, it wasn’t a problem anymore when he published.

The family of theories of value that predict that trade happens are called “subjective theories of value”.

For example, the entire labor theory of value doesn’t hold up on the real world and Economics had already better explanations for the phenomenon it was trying to explain.

In that it ignored the previous half a century of (well tested) advances on the area and just made claims that were already known not to hold on the real world.

Odds are that your computer doesn’t export any language where it will do exactly as you say (amd64 machine code certainly won’t execute exactly as written). And how much difference it makes varies from one language to another.

But the specific example from the OP, of uninitialized variables, is one of those cases where the C spec famously goes completely out of line and says your code can do whatever, run with a random value, fail, initialize it, format your hard drive, make a transaction on your bank account… whatever.

In that it’s an outdated economics theory… In fact, it was outdated when it was first published already.