Nonsense hypotheticals are not whataboutism.
Nonsense hypotheticals are not whataboutism.
“Think” might have been a bit strong. Hope might be more appropriate.
Is that a yes or a no on the good person part?
Do you think that addressed what I said?
Do you think that you are not behaving childishly?
Do you think that I am the other user?
You did make a claim.
Gravity existing and the earth going around the sun have been demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt. Also it’s really easy to cite the evidence that supports those facts.
It was widely known information that cigarettes were good for you at one point so “widely known information” doesn’t mean much. That you even phrased it that was hints that you know the distinction between that and supported fact.
You don’t engage honestly in conversations.
That you didn’t give a helpful answer makes me doubt you where as before I was interested in what you had to say.
You just made that up.
Serious question if you know you don’t engage with discord deeply why do you think anyone here should care about your pointless question?
I dunno. From ABCDE’s comments and Demi’s lyrics I was reading the conversation as being about the latter. I didn’t really see anyone making the case that Wilmer wasn’t being a creep.
I’m not moving the goal posts. Read vaultboy’s post. Of the four sentences (if we ignore the apparent typo) three of them focus only on the age gap. The other establishes the premise of grooming and mentions the age gap again. Vaultboys point never addresses a 17 year old’s capacity to consent. Vaultboy makes a case that the age gap is objectionable. That is a valid point, it’s just not the one that they thought were making.
Your user name is appropriate, but probably not the way you intended.
Your phone or car saying you were near the scene of a crime when it occurred. Your phone or car showing that you regularly cross paths with a person of interest. Jammer would keep those devices from rating you out.
Animal torture sure makes you seems cool.