Exactly. If the headline is garbage, I assume the story is, too. Real journalism that’s worth reading doesn’t need to resort to clickbait.

X’s lawsuit claims the law’s “requirements are so vague and unintelligible that social media platforms cannot understand what the statute permits and what it prohibits.”

Vague, overly broad laws are indeed a problem; I’m willing to give him that. ONLY that.

Unfortunately for Musk, this is not vague. If the footage is something you created or manipulated, you know perfectly damn well whether it’s legal or not. He’s trying to confuse the issue, and conflate fraud with free speech. Hopefully, the court will see right through him.

Okay, I get it. I think you’re right.

What’s a “sound font”?

If it’s against the community rules, it’s either ignorance or deliberate obnoxiousness. When possible, assume ignorance - not everyone is as good as spotting AI slop as you probably are.

If it’s NOT against community rules, then it’s just a matter of personal taste - or, again, ignorance.

Elump will accomplish this not by improving technology or software, but by outlawing any safety regulations that prove inconvenient.

But… I’m confused. Didn’t Musk call empathy a weakness? Surely someone so tolerant, inclusive, and humble couldn’t be wrong.

Huh. I always took the term “lost cause” at face value, and thought it simply meant that the confederacy was hopeless and doomed to fail. I didn’t realize it was based on hypocrisy and lies. Thanks for the heads up!

Edit: the more I read that Wikipedia page, the angrier I get

I’m part of the minority that really likes Joker: Folie à Deux. The ending feels true to the spirit of the story, even if it’s not what the general public (and especially Joker fanboys) wanted.

Concept cars often put creative design ahead of practicality.

deleted by creator

lol I was going to say the exact opposite - “the cybertruck wishes it was this cool”

Hopefully the materials will improve before then. I think foldable screens are a great idea.

Thank you! I was WAY too invested in this!

I have to imagine that a fair amount of that is intentional. Some people are just pigs.

Frankly, if a child somehow makes it into my home, and is left unsupervised long enough to work out which of the 7 remote controls turns on the TV and surround sound system, and figures out how to access Netflix - I’d say they’re mature enough to watch whatever they want.

Gold.

Nothing intelligent to say, just lol

UPDATE PLEASE. I must know the fate of the dishes.

I think it can be done if the parents are tolerant, flexible, and understand that people are naturally curious about other worldviews. Unfortunately, that’s a stratospherically high bar for a lot of people. When the parents sincerely believe that their child’s eternal soul is in danger, ethics come second.

Ironically, I think the people best suited to give religious guidance are agnostics, who readily admit that they don’t know squat about the afterlife or other supernatural topics. Ideally, they won’t pass on hate or bigotry whose only basis is ancient hearsay or hallucinations.

FAFO