Germany is one of the countries against the current chat surveillance proposal, so at least we have that going for us (which is nice)
Germany is one of the countries against the current chat surveillance proposal, so at least we have that going for us (which is nice)
this is the only right way
The type annotations are just fancy comments. They do not do anything at runtime. If you have a function that takes an int someone can still pass in a list or anything else.
They created WordPad because of antitrust issues and never changed it. Try opening a Word document created by a recent version, it’s pretty useless today.
Notepad rules though, it even got UTF8 support recently-ish! /s
I get why they do it though - any change to win10 needs testing and so on and might not be welcomed by the user base. You can always download a free (as in freedom) image editor, some are even on the Microsoft Store. Be glad they did not backport all the bad sides of win11…
Firefox Mobile also has this
I was talking about the history on device, of course I agree: never expect privacy on a device controlled by someone else.
I can confirm there are places where that is possible.
Also as long as they do not whitelist executables, you could use a portable version of a browser.
This is a bug, not enshittification. How would they profit from that?