I’m trying to imagine voluntarily buying a device that all but prohibits you from choosing the software you run on it. A limit of 2-3 apps, which have to be re-signed weekly by a desktop server, to me that doesn’t count as “supporting sideloading.” Maybe technically. What a joke.

“Look what they have to do to mimic a fraction of our power!” -Android users

Wait… You can sideload on ios? Since when?

Yep! The police, being fascists, HATE this.

What?

Pretty sure I hugged it to death with the post. Was working fine for the last couple of days.

Ok cool, but I’ll still support this initiative, because as FUTO states, a keyboard should not connect to the internet.

You’re missing the whole anonymization layer they’ve implemented here. If actual typing data is used, the app can’t guarantee user control of the data after opt-in. The data they’re using here is not private user typing data to begin with.

I’d recommend listening to Louis Rossman’s talks on the subject.

Data is data! You’re a use case, regardless of swipe ability.

The entire point of the keyboard is that it’s not built in. The philosophy behind the organization making it says that it shouldn’t be built in.

Nope

No noticeable difference.

Do you have the LLM fine tuning enabled? Mine is pretty good after a few months of training it.

I thought so too! FUTO is a project worth supporting in my opinion.

Don’t think there’s any new info in the video.

.

a database of banned shapes

banned shapes

banned

shapes

Maybe the dumbest possible idea here from government regulators. You think you’re going to somehow legislate certain geometry out of existence? “Sorry, you can’t print that ILLEGAL SHAPE with the printer you own!” Same vacant headed assholes that think they can ban encryption. Fuck off, shrivel up and perish, please.

I remember instances where the force required to disconnect the connector caused me to slip and rip a wire out.

For those who don’t care to read the full article

Or even the whole title, really