Good point.

Ooh, typo. I’ll edit it so that those who fulfill these kinds of things know not to glass your home.

Trilium. You’ll be glass glad you tried it.

Syncthing-fork on fdroid.

Sirin audiobook reader.

Capitalist action to support communist ideals.

Analysis of true, lifetime cost tacked onto the purchase price.

What was that old adage: “i may not hold the opinion you do, but I will defend your right to hold that opinion.”

I suppose my view on it is similar:

If you believe that a psychological stance should be punished physically, it might behoove you to realize that you are only permitted to hold that opinion by the good graces of those who, rightly, stand ready to destroy you if you try to enforce that view physically.

Clearly they watch it because they enjoy causing terror. They’re basically putting themselves in the shoes of the antagonist, and these movies make our more likely that they will take action on these impulses.

Physical crimes need to be addressed physically.

Psychological crimes need to be addressed psychologically.

Your psycho-pass is clouding, and your crime coefficient is well over 100.

It’s not that we had enough power to guarantee we would make an impact. It’s that we had enough power that we should have tried.

Power makes existing tendencies for corruption obvious.

You want to pull passive aggressive or direct aggressive bullshit in a small group? Well, that’ll work a lot of times. People compensate, or they circumvent you to make things ok. But those same dynamics at scale cause inescapable problems.

Did you even read what I wrote?

Those few Dems are clearly the ones pushing this. But that it should be bipartisan and should have more support in general has nothing to do with false equivocation.

The irony here, though, is that because of your partisan BS, you clearly interpreted that as an insult to the Democrats.

Those three Democrat are focusing on the thing all of the Democrats and Republicans should.

Mental retardation is no excuse for abuse. But it’s still an apt term, in denotation. But the connotation has become unacceptable.

A plant’s growth may be retarded due to various conditions, and that may interfere with it’s prospects for survival.

Fire retardant may prevent a fire from starting, or stop one that has started to develop.

But when considering people, there are a whole slew of subtle problems, including that people may include that in their identity, and give up. They can be treated, possibly, but that’s all for them now. You’re a retard. It leaves no room for other things. People still feel this way about some diagnoses that, if they didn’t lean into them so hard, leave plenty of room for change. But the social weight behind “retard” just carries too much crap, and speaks volumes - some of which may be true, but a lot of which is not.

‘Disabled’, ‘undeveloped’, and ‘inhibited’ can be good terms. But most of it depends more heavily on how we treat others and what has been taken into common use.

Retard is more recently used, and is still being cycled out.

Except that with “retard” and quite a few others, there are genuine traits that are undesirable to most people, thus the constant cycling of terms. Technical terms come in to general and pejorative use, then new technical terms come in to be less pejorative. This the terms more and more vaguely refer to the condition when referencing actual mentally handicapped people.

idiot moron cretin retard (from ‘[profound] mental retardation’)

All technical or health terms that have been cycled into being slurs in common use. Some more terms that have made their way into pejorative use:

Handicapped (not so much pejoratively used, but being cycled out anyways) Special Differently Abled

I’m sure any new technical terms that are used will be picked up for pejorative use soon enough. But “mentally retarded” was and is an apt description, it’s just not socially acceptable anymore because of it’s ease of use as an insult, and the concomitant public view and usage of the word.

I think you may be misunderstanding your “victory” here. I suppose that’s pretty contextual, when it comes down to it.

Time.

.> Almost got away with it. Congrats to him, though. :-)