• 0 Posts
  • 267 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle










  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlWrongthink
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Also, Israel is much much less reliant on the US for aid than in times past, and I think there’s a fear that if we stop supplying them, somebody else will and then we’ll have absolutely no influence over anything they do.

    It seems like the prevailing narrative tries as hard as it can to bury this fact. Unilaterally withdrawing aid doesn’t magically make Israel stop what they’re doing, they can easily get support elsewhere. All unilaterally withdrawing does is throw away our only real bargaining chip to try and nudge them toward ceasefire.





  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlpolitically correct
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    And what is your alternative? That a majority of Americans spontaneously organize and rise up outside of the purview of elections? That they spontaneously organize and vote third party?

    “Useful idiots”, look in the mirror champ. There are plenty of good times to levy well-deserved criticisms at the not-literally-fascists party. Months before a close election between them and the literally-fascists party is not one of them. It’s probably the worst time in fact, and only serves, whatever your moral reasoning is, to increase the probability of a literally-fascists party win. You’ve unwittingly volunteered as a stooge in the troll army helping the right. Congrats, you played yourself.

    You’re strawmanning ultimatums that no one’s saying. All we’re saying is that, functionally, high turnout for Democrats is the best outcome leftists get from the election. Republicans are worse for leftists than Democrats, across the board, full stop. Republicans are worse for the genocide you’re talking about, full stop.

    Muddying the water about the failings of democratic leadership are entirely counterproductive in securing an administration that’s better for the left than the alternative. Big tenting with the neo-libs is how things haven’t gotten more awful than they are.


  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlpolitically correct
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    One of the two is going to win in November and dictate future foreign policy. There are two outcomes, that’s literally an actual dichotomy. Your actions regarding the election (personal voting strategy as well as comments that sway the personal voting strategies of others) ultimately support one of those two outcomes. If you get enough people to abstain in protest against Democratic foreign policy, you are increasing the probability of getting Republican foreign policy.





  • More than 50% of the people.

    Substantially less than 100%. The terms are not synonymous.

    they certainly do provide insight into the language used in the constitution, as well as the intent of the authors.

    Some of the authors. If it was sufficiently representative, it would have made it into the Constitution itself.

    If Congress chooses to discuss a term used in the constitution, their usage does not alter the constitutional meaning, but only establishes a legislative meaning.

    This still does not establish the constitutional meaning. You have notably not provided sufficient evidence to establish a constitutional meaning.

    the states accepted and enacted the constitution in the context of the papers.

    Correct. The states accepted and ratified the Constitution, not the Federalist Papers.

    and have no problem whatsoever considering the disciplined portion to be unambiguously a part of the Militia.

    That portion being the “whole nation”.

    The “whole nation” is not disciplined. I was quite specific: if, and only if, the “whole nation” is disciplined, it is appropriate to consider the “whole nation” to be synonymous with the Militia.

    What if I argue that Congress found a different way to ensure the population was “properly armed and equipped” that didn’t require annual assembly?

    “Properly” being the functional term here. “Armed and equipped” is not the same as “Properly armed and equipped”.

    If you don’t like being held to pedantry, don’t make flippant categorical equivalences of precise legal language.