For the sake of brevity, I’m just going to agree that I’m sea-lioning.

Now, explain how what I’m doing is unethical.

Do you think it’s unethical because it uses stolen art?

If so, I don’t think there’s an issue because I’m not publishing anything I generate.

Do you think it’s unethical because of the electricity usage?

If so, you could make the argument about any frivilous activity which generates electricity.

I really don’t know of a compelling reason besides these two which raises a red flag for you.

I’m not trolling. Why is it unethical for me and my buddies to generate images of a duck with the head of an elephant?

I meant to reply to you, to illustrate it’s not always unethical; a point you raised, not OP.

I use it when I get stoned with my mates and think of funny shit to generate.

Both my partner and I answered the same.

The ball was the size of a tennis ball, no colour.

The person had no gender or any distinguishing features.

The table was a standard kitchen table.

Neither of us knew what the test was about.

COX: Drug traffickers love gizmos. They love gadgets. And if they have something like, ooh, the app is hidden behind a calculator, they think that’s amazing, and they want to buy it.

TIL drug traffickers have the mindset of a teenage boy looking for ways to hide porn.

deleted by creator

PSA. Send stuff to your local post office and then go pick it up.

You can’t trick me, I know a bullet hell when I see one.

Lawful evil

At least they have precident now.

You know, from a business standpoint, it makes financial sense NOT to log user traffic.

Reason one: plausible deniability. You can’t give what you don’t have.

Reason two: storage. Why the fuck would you keep logs, when it costs money to?

Reason three: these boots taste fantastic! (People generally don’t enjoy licking boots).

Get a load of this guy, peeling their apples, grapes and tomatoes.

I do the same with rats

It’s regrettable that it became part of “psychology 101” (in a general sense).

Can you imagine how much misinformation is piggybacking off these “facts” about human nature?

You’re not making the point you think you are.

I understand the implications of both.

I don’t truly call Australian Aboriginals “Australians”, I was being facetious.

Also, I call them “Native Americans”.

That’s what I said ;)

Technically, Australian’s aren’t colonisers; they’re victims of British colonisation.