I think a problem is that many jobs exist in the world, and we don’t even know that most of them exist or what they are. If there are any really large companies near you, see if you can get in doing something, anything. Once you are in, you can learn about the different types of jobs in the company and maybe start trying to work towards something that you like better, either within that company or in another company. Also just having co-workers or a boss to discuss these things with can be a big help and open you up to some new possibilities that you didn’t know about. But yeah, don’t worry about finding your perfect job right away. Having any job will open doors and connections, making it easier to land that perfect job in the future.

Because they have only been dropping for the past month.

AI often gets painted as people vs businesses, but that’s not necessarily what it is in many cases. The EFF is arguing for fair use, which is something that they have stood for as long as I can remember. As the article argues, the businesses creating AIs can easily abide by this law, it’s the little guys training things that would be impacted the most.

Anyone have a link to the text of the bill?

I’m confused, isn’t the translation just on phone, not on the earbuds themselves? What does this have to do with the Airpods?

I’m not going to download and install an app for every damn restaurant I want to eat at.

And we are still waiting on the day when these models can actually be run on AMD GPUs without jumping through hoops.

The only other one I know is hidive. It carries some different shows than Crunchyroll.

The hard part is getting anyone to look at it.

Would it be possible for a browser or extension to just provide false metadata in order to subvert this type of fingerprinting?

I think floorp looks interesting, but I haven’t moved to it yet.

All I want is something that does a sidebar as well as Vivaldi. Why is a sidebar so difficult?

Was it every bit as good as you had hoped?

Found a frog in the toilet once.

It’s certainly been odd to watch the general perceptions on copyright shift as AI has come around. From what I can tell, it stems from a general David vs Goliath mentality. Years ago when filesharing started to come around, it was seen as the common people against the large corporations. The MPAA would try to tell us that downloading a movie is “stealing” and we all told them to fuck off. Now, culture has changed, a lot more people consider themselves to be creators, or social media lets people feel closer to creators. Now, its the big tech companies up against individual artists. Rather than seeing it in terms of copyright itself, people just see big bad company against little guys.

Meme coins DON’T justify their valuation. That’s why they’re called meme coins.

Figure out what you want to do, and make a plan to do it. Obviously some stuff is more achievable than others, but there are surely some things that you can do.

Per the article, they just developed a faster algorithm for a specific type of material simulation.

This looks like it has some potential. I’ll probably give this a try.

It may vary depending on your jurisdiction. Under US copyright law, I believe that generated images are not copyrightable, so you wouldn’t have any protections from anyone copying your cover, but I doubt that’s a big concern. The model or service that you use may also have various terms in their license that restrict what you are allowed to do with the generated images. Finally, you also need to make sure that your image isn’t violating someone else’s copyright. If you generate an image that is too similar to an existing image, that could be problematic.

The way I see it, it’s not so much an issue of making something that’s better than the other standards. It’s really about getting your standard into actual use and hitting critical mass which makes all the other standards irrelevant.