I was talking about Boeing, but I accidentally described communism ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Friends don’t let friends use proprietary software.
https://mastodon.social/@thann
https://lemmy.world/u/thann
https://gitlab.com/thann
I was talking about Boeing, but I accidentally described communism ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You have a cabal of elites who say they are improving the lives of the working class while executing any workers who disagree with them
Would be dope if it supported public-key stuff like ECDH and signing
slaps roof of coffin
So what would it take to get you in one of these?
Siri create a random dataset in the likeness of peter jacksons lord of the rings: the return of the king directors cut on dvd
Any review that doesn’t begin and end with “its a great phone, but it’s 4x the price of last years budget model and only provides a modest improvement” is just an advertiment
Similar product that costs 4 times as much and has AI features…
It actually highlights the risk of having unaudited third party software running on your critical infrastructure
A wasteland of competing standards lol
More like a bountiful harvest. Even the dogshit programs windows users buy are mostly made with FOSS libraries.
The real answer is windows apologists don’t want to hear Linux users gloating about how this never happened to linux, and how dogshit their beloved os is
The envelope contains a barrel of diesel and a lit flare
Is it less expensive than ransomware though?
No, you run Linux with automatic secutity updates turned on
Its about trusting the data you’re decrypting actually came from who you think it came from.
So the data is signed with your public key, and your public key is published so people can verify the other stuff you publish. Your email is there just so people can communicate back to you…
You can of course put junk info in the fields if you want, but the purpose of the program is enabling trustworthy lines of communication.
No you don’t, you can just fork it, add a commit, and walk away, and everyone can decide which one they want to clone
People want simple answers, and “blockchain bad” seems to satisfy many
And nobody ever forked a project, and lived happily ever after, then end.
Git is a real-life use-case
They also wanted users to know that if their chips are fried that it was the users own fault and no refunds will be issued