But considering the obvious lack of knowledge around AIs, it should have.

Funny as the internet was designed as being free.

Maybe just educate yourself a little. In general, not just about that.

Seems pretty mild and reasonable, to be honest.

Gosh, if only there was an in-between that doesn’t imply attacking people for things caused by diseases or genes, huh.

But sadly you can’t avoid supporting something bad, without being insulting, demeaning and discriminatory.

What a world we live in.

The punishment will be less big than the profit, they won’t stop, as usual.

lol funny

And where then? It is about changing a part of the software, that fits quite clearly an issue/pull request

Well on the contrary you should understand it more. A gendered pronoun carries an idea of gender, and having a genderless pronoun frees the sentence of this gender assumption. Nothing very hard to understand.

Cancel culture, this far-right myth that fascists love so much. You forgot to continue and talk about freedom of speech and how you are a centrist.

Refusing the change is pushing a political agenda too. But I guess it helps seeing which agenda you prefer ;)

It’s the one with a dev that thinks that replacing “he” by “they” is political propaganda?

Yeah, no thanks.

Publicly available does not mean free to use.

“I am not ignorant”

That would have been the less insulting explanation.

The amount of ignorance in this comment is impressive.

Brave is notoriously dubious at best, encouraging ads and cryptocurrencies. It doesn’t have any advantages over a hardened Firefox (and I would say even a basic one), so using it doesn’t really make sense.

Encryption is generally “open source” and that’s what makes is strong. Security does not come from people not knowing how things work, but by having properly designed things that work whether people know how they work or not.

Yes but that’s not what people think. They use it as a search engine, a programmer and a teacher. This is my problem, they use it as something it absolutely isn’t and base their opinions, knowledge and work on that.

Unless you are a rock, your brain processes information to extract meaning from it. AIs don’t.

It does not work. At most it looks like it works.

A human brain is able to understand and process information. An AI simply calculates a mathematical function. There is no reasoning and no understanding of anything, all that ChatGPT does is try to look like a human. And by “try to look like a human”, I mean “generate sentences that can be believable, on shape, to be written by a human”.

If you ask it to calculate 2+2, and then tell it that it is equal to 5, it won’t see any problem because it doesn’t understand any of it. But it will give you answers that are, grammatically speaking, reasonably human.

If I ask a rock how much is 2+2 and I throw it, and it bounces 4 times, it does not mean that this rock knows how to count. ChatGPT and similar are just better illusions, but they’re nothing more.

If anything, people who like chatGPT are the ones ignorant of how it works (spoiler: it doesn’t).

And kids with their understanding of technology being limited to youtube and tiktok have no clue about what an AI is. They see it, like most people, as a magic black box that is incredibly smart. Apart from being a black box, none of that is true.