The only issue with that is, it takes a ton of resources to make, yeah?
The only issue with that is, it takes a ton of resources to make, yeah?
In the US, you would be called a liberal.
I will never understand that version of what you’re talking about. They should just buy out some land and build their own town, but watch out for bears.
Thanks for explaining, I think I understand how I feel about things better now too.
It’s kind of like when the UK says fanny, they mean vagina and the US means butt. It does and will cause misinformation to thrive. Just because we have 2 different meanings, that doesn’t mean either is wrong.
That’s not what I mean, I know you will get it. But US politics has a lot of misinformation going on, mixing up terms the US uses for certain things can make the misinformation thrive. In US terms, you sound like a liberal. You don’t want a nanny state, you want a government owned by the people.
So you’re not in the US? Confusing the terms makes it harder for the US, but probably easier for others ig.
but DOES believe in rules and various degrees of enforcement to defend the powerless from the powerful.
So, kind of a soft government? What about roads and utilities? What really turns me off of libertarian is the belief that people have to pay for their own roads and fireman. The rich will only survive then, kind of like how our healthcare is right now. But if you’re saying that the government is ran more like a co-op, then I get it.
I have never heard of a Left-libertarian, what are your libertarian views?
That’s why I’m already on different instances, it’s not hard at all to switch and compare.
Looks like the professor had set up the whistleblower, facebook, archive before they were fired:
Since the endowment doesn’t need the cash, I wonder what the person making the decision personally received as a payoff.
Edit: Here are the documents talking about the whistleblowing: https://whistlebloweraid.org/joan-donovan-disclosure-harvard-betrayed-academic-freedom-and-the-public-interest-to-protect-meta/
I think it could to a small degree but not to the degree Reddit went abusive to its users. If lemmy.world got weird, I’d just leave and go to another one. I don’t really care all that much what instance I’m on except that the trolls are kept down and the front page posts a lot of diverse stuff.
Still not great:
OTA, a clinically relevant mycotoxin, can accumulate in human tissue and cause a variety of serious health conditions.[43] Potential consequences of OTA poisoning include kidney damage, kidney failure and cancer but the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not set maximum permissible levels of OTA in food unlike the EU that set maximum permissible levels in a variety of food products
I think you’re right, lol. I was reading a blog that was trying to sell herbal remedies and was talking about how it was originally from citrus and I think I confused the two names. It turned out to be true information since I used their source for NIH.
Right? I hadn’t thought of that. I just always thought *citric acid was you know, made of citrus.
I have family that send me saint cards and pray to certain saints for things to go well in my life. I don’t believe in it, but they do and it makes them feel safe and like they’re doing something. So tbf, it does do something for the person praying. I don’t mind people praying for me.
…So the elves? Holy shit, Santa was an asshole.
Is it? We’ve been making glass for centuries and it’s the one thing that is consistently recycled. You would have to grow the wood (resources), transport the wood (resources), change the wood’s properties (resources) and there is no recycling in place.