Get a grip, dude.

Maybe, but I’m more thinking you’re too dumb to understand an analogy.

Would you claim the company he worked for has zero understanding of how to do electrical work?

No? He claimed they have ‘zero ideas of how to engineer’ I disagree. I don’t even know what gives me the energy to go against the incessant Elon hate cirkle jerk, but it is so tiresome

I’m not talking about Elon engineering fricking rockets by himself, I’m talking about the dude in the comment thinking that Elons companies doesn’t have an engineering culture that can deliver, which is plain just not true.

I mean hate on the man, I don’t give a damn but don’t be dishonest is all I’m saying

Ok, so another of Elons companies sends rockets to space, so again, they clearly now engineering…

These people have just about zero idea about how the engineering process works, and it shows.

Well, now that’s obviously not true. They wouldn’t have drivable cars if they had no idea how to engineer one…

You’re all raving like madmen

I don’t know, you tell me

OP is describing the events of a civil war and thats what we’re discussing. I don’t know what it is you’re arguing about though.

I’ll ignore the comment about reddit, whatever that has to do with anything …

By starting a civil war? Are you insane?

The fearmongering ravings of an American doomer.

But as absurd as it is I truly fear for a people who start to reason like this. I hear it more and more often, just this thread alone…

It might be hard for us Europeans to understand but I think we need to take it seriously.

That’s not how these addictive disorders works… they’re never satisfied and always need more.

It feeds and evolves a disorder which in turn increases risks of real life abuse.

But if AI generated content is to be considered illegal, so should all fictional content.

Yeah no I doubt it

I’ve had mine for two years without burn ins

No, they just calculate with increased size of the training roster… it’s not that complicated. Which is a fair presumption as that is how we’ve increased the predictive precision so far.

Well obviously they cannot rule out techniques no one has though of but likewise they obviously accounted for what they deemed to be within the realm of possibility

What you mentioned is assumed video and paper in question.

The main argument being that no matter our computational techniques, the diminishing returns in predictive precision is reached far sooner than we achieve general intelligence.

No, there will be Spyware in the fucking diodes…