The statistics thing is a downside of how Mastodon implements ActivityPub.
Two possibilites:
I think you can simply hide the counts if it irritates you.
You can install Fedifetcher to pull in missing interactions to your local server: https://github.com/nanos/FediFetcher
I see that this account has a few topics it posts on. Now, that alone doesn’t mean anything. Lots of lemmy users have their 3, 4 topics they are interested in and nothing more. Maybe they are an enthusiastic green party voter.
But that amount of posts in such a short timespan smells like a bot account.
The German franchise license holders for Burgerking seem to be some of the worst around…
It’s not about who you condemn, dude. It’s about what exactly you condemn them about. That really shouldnt be such a complicated concept.
Well if you say there is “a trait in a group of peoples’ character” then you should be called racist. This has nothing to do with being against religions.
It’s like back in the day gifting rout bought newspaper copy to someone else to read
There was a clause in the regulations that led broadcasters to basically be scared of losing their license if they didnt include public-interest content in their programming. Plus news wasnt obligated to make profit by the managers
This is the US, minors posting themselves would also lead to arrests.
(And the actual platform with a reputation for minors selling their nudes would be Snapchat)
The article explains it in one case, an adult woman verified the account and then they posted a minor’s videos on it instead.
But the article also said that they only know about 30 cases in 5 years in the US. Which doesn’t sound like a huge amount to me personally (still too many obviously)
Yeah.
Diaz set up an account and had a woman verify it as hers. That woman, whom police didn’t identify, later quit OnlyFans. But her account remained live and accessible to Diaz. He filled it with videos of the underage girl
That’s really not easy to catch, no matter what platform you are. Some people will do complicated shit to evade the eyes of the law for their illicit activities.
They are known for making a browser that constantly puts them into a financial deficit. Mozilla is still looking for a way to pay their bills in the long run.
Sure. Like @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] or @[email protected] … and there definitely are more people that I see regularly and simply cant think of their names right now
Yeah, that red circle around Utøya is really sad 😞
My bad. Doesnt change what I mean though: the AI should not say “it’s also great to put glue on the pizza” - it should either not reference that at all or say “fucksmith on reddit recommends glue on pizza”.
The main field where they are already actively in professuonal use are rough drafts in creative fields: quickly generate possible outlines for a text, a speech, an art piece. Visualize where something could be going, in order to decide which direction to pick.
Also, models that work differently from the GPTs are already in use in science, scanning through huge amounts of texts in archives to help analyzing or search for something in particular. Help find patterns in things for studies. Etc.
The “personal assistant AI” thing obviously isnt quite working yet. I think it will take some time and models with a different technological structure (not GPT) to achieve progress in that regard.
IMO these issues are mainly with the interface / how the AI summaries are presented.
The issue with incorrect answers like the glue on pizza one isnt “hallucination”. The LLM is pulling that info from an existing webpage (The Onion). The thing they need to change is how that info is portrayed. Not “one tip is to use glue”, but rather “the satirical site the Onion says to use glue”.
Hallucination should be combatted by the fact that the AI cant show a proper source for facts it made up itself.
The original commenter @[email protected] did neither specify their own sex nor the gender of the people they tutored.
Multiple people under that comment simply assumed that OP is male and was tutoring girls. That is heteronormative. Yes, I formulated that with a bit of snark. But come on.
You guys ooze heteronormativism
I think it used to allow all kinds of erotic content and fetish stuff, just not outright porn.
It’s possible that this raid was connected to a current police operation to arrest users of a darknet child abuse website.