2016
2020
2024! 🤞
Keep it light, keep it moving.
I am doing no harm.
2016
2020
2024! 🤞
I knew someone who got caught up in their pyramid marketing scheme. The prizes were some low quality shit. The watch they won got badly scratched and the wristband’s pin fell off the same day from regular use. It was pretty funny watching it disintegrate in real time.
It doesn’t have to be free but come on.
I beg to differ! My degree was free for all intents and purposes, and no, it didn’t take away from the challenge or the quality of education. I cried blood tears in order to graduate but it was worth it.
how all the vaccines have some chemical in it like bleach
Ohh, been there! But in my case, the kicker was that she then went off on a tangent on how her daughter was a medical doctor who “believes in all this science stuff” and how “the younger generations are more brainwashed”. Bruh.
Ohh wow. What a way to make a lifelong friend!
And with good reason. It didn’t help that Dubya was a sketchy sob!
Jenny is a legend. Her content is awesome.
Yeah, I think there was something like that floating around. I imagine it’s costly, though, but it’d be nice to have.
I like the concept and I have it installed, but I don’t contribute to it because I find it challenging to think of better titles. It’s not easy like with Sponsorblock that I regularly submit to. For example, sometimes I need to watch most of the video first to be accurate, and by then I’ve already moved on to the next video. Other times it’s simply hard for me to condense the content of the video accurately into so many characters when the original title is way off.
I do like the way it makes all the titles lowercase, though. I find that changes the tone of the video feed quite a bit.
I don’t mind someone doing whatever on their phone out of sight. But this shit drives me insane. You won’t watch that damn video ever again in your life, stop ruining it for everyone else!
I quickly learned how ChatGPT works so I’m aware of its limitations. And since I’m talking about university students, I’m fairly sure those smart cookies can figure it out themselves. The thing is, studying the biological sciences requires you to understand other subjects you haven’t learned yet, and having someone explain how that fits into the overall picture puts you way ahead of the curve because you start integrating knowledge earlier. You only get that from retrospection once you’ve passed all your classes and have a panoramic view of the field, which, in my opinion, is too late for excellent grades. This is why I think having parents with degrees in a related field or personal tutors gives an incredibly unfair advantage to anyone in college. That’s what ChatGPT gives you for free. Your parents and the tutors will also make mistakes, but that doesn’t take away the value which is also true for the AIs.
And regarding the output that appears correct, some tools help mitigate that. I’ve used the Consensus plugin to some degree and think it’s fairly accurate for resolving some questions based on research. What’s more useful is that it’ll cite the paper directly so you can learn more instead of relying on ChatGPT alone. It’s a great tool I wish I had that would’ve saved me so much time to focus on other more important things instead of going down the list of fruitless search results with a million tabs open.
One thing I will agree with you is probably learning how to use Google Scholar and Google Books and pirating books using the library to find the exact information as it appears in the textbooks to answer homework questions which I did meticulously down to the paragraph. But only I did that. Everybody else copied their homework, so at least in my university it was a personal choice how far you wanted to take those skills. So now instead of your peers giving you the answers, it’s ChatGPT. So my question is, are we really losing anything?
Overall I think other skills need honing today, particularly verifying information, together with critical thinking which is always relevant. And the former is only hard because it’s tedious work, honestly.
If I had access to ChatGPT during my college years and it helped me parse things I didn’t fully understand from the texts or provided much-needed context for what I was studying, I would’ve done much better having integrated my learning. That’s one of the areas where ChatGPT shines. I only got there on my way out. But math problems? Ugh.
I’m not sure what this one’s called but it’s very pulular in Mexico.
I know what you mean. I’ve had more than one conversation with devs who didn’t understand design basics.
For me, it was the interface. I found it rough around the edges and not as inviting as Twitter used to be. I know it’s seen as superficial but UX/UI is important.
Like, for example, to create a post or reply, the input was on the left navigation panel for some reason. I used to have trouble visually separating one post from the next in my head until I got used to it. Also, the way thread comments were nested could’ve been improved. And why did it only show me the top 5 trending news stories? Why couldn’t I browse more? Idk, overall I felt like I was fighting the UI mentally.
I think Lemmy did a better job subtly improving on the details. I didn’t see Mastodon doing that much when I was on there.
Indubitably
I think Lemmy is so small that people hold grudges over the stupidest things and downvote on sight to feel better about themselves. Don’t mind those energy vampires. I could say puppies are great and still expect at least one downvote for no reason.
There’s a bitter bastard in every thread. 🤷♂️
I’ve had so many accidents with some that needed surgery and nothing beats getting my finger stuck in the car door of an Uber. I’m just glad the driver didn’t move until after I freed my finger.
Funnily enough, as a kid I always associated shoplifting with women stealing cosmetics and once saw a woman run past me with a security guard chasing after her. It’s one of the only crimes I do associate primarily with women but only because of circumstance. Lol