Academic research is the standard that should be aimed for. References and no opinions.
Academic research is the standard that should be aimed for. References and no opinions.
Yes, it is possible to fact check with integrity. Not like this example.
Opinions should not enter into fact checking as opinions are not fact.
In this case the job of these people is clearly to perform damage limitation for the WEF
This is why fact checks are bullshit. Reuters admits that
a WEF social media video from 2016 that stated eight predictions about the world in 2030, including: “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy. What you want you’ll rent, and it’ll be delivered by drone.”
Now to make the statement false they bring in a strawman “Stated goal” condition and prove that particular part to be false, then claim that makes the whole thing false.
Such bullshit.
What I was fishing for. Thanks.
I vote John von Neumann for tech savant.
Chatgpt is decidedly unerotic in its responses.
Not voting at all is just laziness.
Spoiled ballots may have some long term influence. But they have no power over the election being boycotted.
Certainly not. But choosing to punish at this precise opportunity would be like shooting your own feet.
Punish at the local level. Punish by supporting voting reform. Etc.
Ironically, this sort of thing is what chatgpt excels at.
You have to think of the lack of primary as a sunk cost. The decision in front of you is independent of all previous decisions.
IMHO, RFK jr is pro environment and anti big phama. He changes his policies based on fashion more than money. He is populist, not corporatist.
Both the Republican and Democrat parties are corporatist because of lobbying. Nothing to do with Trump. If we voted Hillary and Kamala then the same court outcome would occur.
How does a 1998 law have retroactive rights over previously published works?
Even without musk it is still the worst iron man.
Keep a close eye on worldcoin.
The cost is spent, but the offices are still assets on the balance sheet.
If demand for offices is lower then all companies that own offices will have to revalue theirs downwards. These impairments have a direct impact on the P&L of the company accounts. Better to force employees to use these assets (and pay their own costs to do so) than show a (greater) accounting loss.
Can you expand on why?
One argument could be that FIDO2 and WebAuthn primarily rely on algorithms like RSA and non blockchain elliptic curves, but extending the algorithms covered in standards shouldn’t be too difficult as open source libraries exist.
It almost makes me want to download FLUX and start generating some graphic novels.
Maybe the AI training could be paused until the sun comes out again.
Coal and nuclear are not on demand either. Only hydro and gas offer any real flexibility.
The half life of solar panels is insignificant.
The half life of high grade nuclear waste is significant.
It has already happened
Tea bricks were the preferred form of currency over metallic coins for the nomads of Mongolia and Siberia. The tea could not only be used as money and eaten as food in times of hunger but also brewed as allegedly beneficial medicine for treating coughs and colds. Until World War II, tea bricks were still used as a form of edible currency in Siberia
Money can be anything.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania