If evil was both natural and convenient, everyone would be evil.

Profits are higher than ever, but line must go up so you’re all fired.

I had a guy whose pitch was “Ok, you’re the president.”

That was the game idea. The whole thing.

“Ok, I did the overall plot. Who’s doing the dialogue?”

Imagine pretending you don’t understand the value of PR and propaganda in a war.

Do we have to wait until the civil war, or is this offer current?

That’s what a glowie would say!

Will you send socks?

Nice try, glowie!

Stop trying to social engineer my password, DEA!

The question is whether she resigned or was fired as well. Her job was to protect the company, which includes not firing productive staff.

Lol

Oh, there’s definitely a ton of communist propaganda, did you block .ml?

Do you consider anarchism/democratic socialism to not be communist at a certain level, ie, consider “communist” thought only to include authoritarian Marxism?

.world only bans you if you criticize Biden too frequently

Removed by mod

Eh, as you mentioned, it was deeply unpopular.

But yes. It would have.

Why would you think changing history would not change history?

The imperial powers that were direct threats to the revolution and they were already fighting, buddy, aka the Ottomans and the Germans. Hey, remind me how that worked out in the end? Did the People’s Government get a seat at Versailles? No? Had to fight a war against fucking Poland first and then get even more people killed by Germany later?

And your argument is “the decision was unpopular,” not that it was wrong.

You also find that they were not overthrown. Their political alliance was couped, like what happens in a “real democracy” when you push an unpopular policy. Even then, they supported the Bolsheviks anyways in the civil war.

Generally speaking, it’s considered rude to murder all of your fellow socialists anyways if that happens.

Describe what you consider the “third way” that isn’t capitalists owning the means of production, workers owning the means, or the state owning the means.

If you didn’t willingly ignore the sins of “your side” that’d be valid.

Meanwhile, the only criticism you launch at the Mensheviks is… They wanted to keep fighting the imperial powers?

Don’t get me wrong, it was just a bad decision, but it wasn’t, ya know, genociding fellow socialists.

I’d personally criticize them for thinking they needed to follow the traditional Marxist thought that economic liberalism was a required stage on the path to socialism.

deleted by creator