I am too stupid. This is true. Too stupid to buy an iPhone too.

Yeah there are much more intelligent takes on this, but they’re arriving at similar conclusions.

https://www.404media.co/why-did-grok-start-talking-about-white-genocide/

That cope at the end 😂

Do you know the context of the quote?

“In a Sea Parks??”

This is what a kleptocratic oligarchy looks like folks. Suck up to the big man and he’ll let you fleece the joint.

He’s got one trick folks.

I can’t tell you how much nicer it is to have a hybrid or ev bus pass you as a pedestrian than a massive rumbling stinking diesel.

We all know it’s actually the hyperlinked text, the buttons are a lie

I worked in advertising for over 10 years before a career change. I saw how much money was wasted on programmatic digital advertising. I’d recommend checking out the book, The Subprime Attention Crisis

‘Targeted advertising’ is shockingly untargeted. As the underpinning of our digital economy, the value of online advertising is dangerously overinflated.

What was that story warning people that if they use RedNote they’ll experience ‘Chinese style censorship’ for the first time?

US using the old if you can’t beat em approach

Do not forget me user4616250

Look down, look down You’ll always be a slave Look down, look down You’re standing in your grave

Fair call. I only just got the community update so I hadn’t seen it.

deleted by creator

Well it’s not really an either/or situation. The current Labor government’s plan is a combination of majority renewables with gas and hydrogen. They are also running coal at the moment but have no plans to renew those plants during the transition. They’ve signed on to emissions reductions of 75% by 2035.

So you’ve got one plan which has some reduction targets (probably not steep enough) planned transition, costed and budgeted that doesn’t require more coal, and one plan which will pull funding from renewables, and requires more coal until some time as which they can get nuclear approved, built and commercialised.

Context is important here. The conversation here was about Australia’s nuclear capacity. A country where nuclear power is banned at both state and federal levels. Where the plan for it’s use is currently uncosted, the planned sites have been selected without environmental protection studies and several of which are supposed to be SMRs.

Would you build a bleeding edge nuclear reactor without a legal framework to govern its construction or operation? Without a workforce trained in its functions? Without considering the environmental factors of its geography? Without considering the cost?

Probably not. But that’s the current plan put forward by the reactionary right in Australia and this from a party who doesn’t believe in climate change, have no emissions targets, and whose whole plan is to continue to run and build coal power until whatever time they work out the details on nuclear.

Yeah they’re kind of the ultimate monopolization machine