For what use though, karma means nothing here. If a long established account tomorrow started posting blatant propaganda or some shit we’d call it out immediately

Common UK Appeasement L

Well his general leadership of Twitter.

His absolutist take on “Free Speech” that allowed alt right and Nazi groups to flourish and spread on his platform

Then the eventual sale to Elon Musk, where he kept acting like he had no choice/no say in the sale.

You do realize we’re not talking about those people right?

glances at list of comms I mod/created Okay buddy. From the looks of it you’re not even a mod HERE in this comm, so, whatever have a nice day

Did he ever possess a different world view? Or did we assume someone in tech in early 2000s must be actually smart and not a bad person, only to find out they’re a piece of shit a la, Zuck, Dorsey, Musk, etc.

Remember there was a time we didn’t know everything about these people and the notion that they were creating these platforms and industries for the betterment of man kind didn’t seem so crazy.

Now we know every last one of them is a money obsessed freak with entire cemeteries in their closets, touting “Effective Altruism” or “Rationalism” or whatever new fad fake philanthropists are claiming this quarter.

Seems needlessly extreme to just wipe away conversions

Then why is THAT comment deleted. Just trying to squash the conversation.

Banned for calling out facts lmao

adults born between 1963, when the first measles vaccine was approved, and 1968. During that period, some children received an inactivated (killed) measles vaccine that was less effective than the live vaccine.

People born before 1957 are considered to have “presumptive evidence” of immunity, because nearly everyone born during this period got the disease during childhood. But health-care workers born before 1957 who don’t have proof of immunity should consider getting the vaccine.

https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/should-you-get-a-measles-vaccine-booster

No acronyms at my table

What’s the catch

Explain to me why this should apply to a visa applicant? They are not here yet, they are still within their country and want to enter here so your “on American soil” argument doesn’t make sense. Seems pretty reasonable to me to be actually vetting people who enter a country. By actual investigative means and not arbitrary ones.

Don’t understand how this is wrong, they’re asking for your @ not your login. They’re doing a background check on you regardless so say for Facebook they’re just going to look you up anyway this just shortens the process.

If it’s a public facing account I don’t get what’s so “wrong” about this

They wanted 1 BILLION, and they got $230 Million

Friend of mine demonstrated at a tech conference obtaining fingerprints from photos. Example was a someone giving a political speech, hand held up at the right angle and a powerful enough camera.

If there is a community that is clearly abandoned and you want to put in the work you can request mod status from an instance admin

What’s wrong with just a paper poster?

Always has been.png

Even so, the radar is at least better than not a damn thing.