A nice explanation of what’s wrong with web-based AI. I hope other content providers follow suit.

Fuck Immigration Fuck your MAGA

Search is to Google as F150 is to Ford…anything that threatens it makes the whole thing crumble.

This worked on me, I just became a contributor

How can i take an article that uses the word “anywho” seriously?

I think when you’ve gone ad homonym then I won

No, the camera data is combined into one visual “truth” I would bet. There was a fatal accident where the radar didn’t see a truck because it shot under it. At the time the radar was more trusted than the camera. The only way to solve that was to only have one sensor, and radar could never be the sole input.

Hey hey hey, that’s autocratic megalomaniac rapist conman, can’t leave out his best stuff.

Why does no one mention why they said they dropped RADAR: Who do you trust when vision conflicts with RADAR? There were constant problems on this point. LIDAR is another redundant and possibly conflicting input.

Am I showing my age if I suggest ImageMagick?

Only 4 near misses on the demo video!

If their best angle is to recycle a 20 year old brand …well I can’t imagine that will go very far

It’ll be less than a decade

AI already has to deal with hallucinations, throw in government censorship too and I think it becomes even less of a serious, useful tool.

This should kill off NPM

First off it looks like none of the demo items failed at the event, so that’s a nice change.

Same. I love my FSD and I’ve watched it go from 80% a few years ago to around 95% now.

Oh thank goodness! I would hate to have some hackers invade my television set and my viewing habits be pwned by somebody … Besides Samsung I mean… or anyone who might be willing to pay Samsung.

A new low

^ this is the answer I was about to give