and do you have one of those? Because form what I hear they beep when you’re being a good drive too and you end up being a worse (than good) driver trying not to get the beeps
and do you have one of those? Because form what I hear they beep when you’re being a good drive too and you end up being a worse (than good) driver trying not to get the beeps
when the food has 2 days worth of sodium in it, you get thirsty. Many people don’t drink enough water so then your thirsty and have your liter-of-cola and you can down it easily at that point
Do you have a written summary of that? I hate watching videos, and the dark forest book was fun but without a clue I don’t understand the change to internet
When in most of our lifetimes has the u.s. presidental election not been ‘the lesser of two evils’?
You mean ‘native advertising’? that is something r/hailcorporate was pointing out for years, I wonder if it’s been banned yet
don’t be stupid.
Rate those places online to warn others. fucking hailCorporate nonsense
the old re-badge where the same car is made by a different company
Did they even contribute any meaningful technology discoveries or anything in the field?
but sounded correct to someone who didn’t know better
specious /spē′shəs/ adjective
Having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually fallacious.
"a specious argument."
and then the real answer will be hidden or something silly, or in some cases where money is involved the correct answer might have been removed
They have probably only provided a small amount of available data, and have much more data, of different type.
Yes we’ve got the data, but now we need it from different angles!
They’ve finally gone full /HailCorporate, become the thing some of the original people of the site would probably not have agreed with in many ways
We all agree with this premise and mostly that the FPTP system is a large contributing factor to the TPS saying how it has based on seeing how places that don’t have a TPS appear to do so because the have different voting systems like different iterations of ranked choice voting.
What I am wondering is what ‘we’ think the best way to implement voting would be?
I disagree in the sense that I think voting is useful but just up/down is not. A consensus engine that can judge each aspect of a statement alone and in a group can be used to find what is misleading, dishonest, and the like as well as what is simply untrue or lies.
the old subreddit r/aBetterWorld is an idea that would help you exactly in this instance if it were not just an idea
hail emoji?