AnonTwo

To be fair, only a handful of publishers were able to take their cards and go elsewhere. The media companies were a lot more on top of dragging their products off of Netflix.

Nobody would be on steam just for Valve games, after all, and indie has a much lower barrier of entry.

While they could certainly distribute their current products better, a lot of the issues they have now (see: belated frogs comment) aren’t things they really had control over.

I mean, Russia flubbed so hard the whole world saw it.

Israel clearly has the arsenal everyone thought Russia did.

What makes you think the killing will stop?

If your reason is “Because they will be dead”, then I think you have your answer.

I mean, we do have the phrase “Take justice into your own hands”

You can do wrong by someone that receives retribution, without a law being present for it.

Laws just make that much, much, much less murky.

Polio is also mandatory for life if you get it.

Whats so complicated about probability?

Probably that it is at the end of the day still chance, and once it happens it happens.

Almost all people who didn’t vaccinate against covid are still alive and well you know.

Pretty sure that’s wrong.

People take a risk either way. Taking the vaccine or not taking it.

You’re also taking a risk to take the disease head-on or not. Side effect of Covid include

-Excessively high fever
-Weakness
-Potential risk of Long Covid
-Fucking death

All that research and none of it towards how much the vaccine wouldn’t have affected you huh? Well just don’t pass it off to the next generation you POS.

Pretty sure most people think of Covid, the thing a lot of people did die to, or Polio, the returning sickness that we literally had a president who couldn’t walk because of.

Fun part being we’re having life-debilitating diseases (again, polio) come back from the results of the anti-vax rhetoric.

So you’ve never been truly sick is all that means. Just means you’ll die when you have a truly dangerous sickness and don’t take any precautions for it.

All of which would still apply to Elon Musk. No way the guys open sourcing his microchips.

A lot of medicines have side effect. And a lot of side effects. But you still take them because The thing you’re taking them for fucking sucks

There’s being careful and there’s forgetting the whole point of it all: to not get a life-debilitating sickness. Which a lot of vaccines eliminate.

Didn’t the animal tests lead to pretty bad deaths? And wasn’t that less than a year ago? I can’t imagine this going well.

Plus there was the blind-tech that was revealed not too long ago where now that they’re bankrupt the group is slowly going blind and worse. I feel like none of this is going to end well.

You leaked the code for when it’s out of warranty

So really you’re only playing moderator because you’re for it, and don’t want people to vote against it.

I mean, “obviously causing damage to our health”

The issue with that is the question “And do what?”

Like what matters is that you do something that is actually healthy for your body. Internet is if anything probably a step up from the age of couch surfing on the TV, since you at least need to actively navigate it. Mostly meaning to say that you could easily just choose something that isn’t any better.

But either way you’d be better off just choosing something healthy to do, like exercise.

Was strict the default? I’d assume the standard would be the default.

I’d imagine if you were using strict you want the sites to break because you absolutely do not want fingerprinting. That kindof restriction usually comes with the breaking being expected.

Uhhh…that’s not a meme, as the other guy said it’s virtue signalling. I don’t even know why you would fallback on it being a meme since people generally agreed with what you said.

If anything I think that makes you sound like an ass but that’s just me.

I mean yeah, but Spez we know for a fact actually did something.

Okay

But in this entire discussion we haven’t even tied him or his homophobia to the feature change this article is discussing.

I mean, it’s more like I wanted to see more discussion about brave. It’s not even like it’s talking about things the CEO specifically did to the browser, it’s just talking about the CEO.

And yeah I’m complaining about different threads in a post, when 3 comments are about the browser and like 15 are about the CEO.

If you have something to say negative about brave from this feature, that’s cool, but I’m not seeing it.