Huh? Is this relevant, or some kind of bot spam?
Huh? Is this relevant, or some kind of bot spam?
So far, this isn’t much of anything.
Telegram already closes public channels reported for copyright violations.
Some excerpts from this post:
Compared to other platforms, we do not see the seriousness of Telegram to cooperate.
. . .
In May 2023, progress appeared to be going in the wrong direction. Telegram was reportedly refusing to cooperate with the Ministry of Communications and Digital on the basis it did not wish to participate in any form of politically-related censorship.
. . .
With no obviously public comment from Telegram on the matter, it’s hard to say how the social platform views its end of what appears to be an informal agreement.
Telegram will be acutely aware, however, that whatever it gives, others will demand too. That may ultimately limit Telegram’s response, whatever it may be, whenever it arrives – if it even arrives at all.
This link doesn’t work for me. Do you have an alternative/original? I’d like to read some context and explanation.
In 2020 I paid a one time fee for a lifetime of Pro. Is that definitely not still an option?
Find the wiki page for “hard mode.”
Ah, well I love that policy (types being in code, not configs). FWIW I sometimes use it as a hand-edited document, with a small type-specifying file, to generate json/yaml/toml for other programs to load.
Ever tried NestedText? It’s like basic YAML but everything is a string (types are up to the code that ingests it), and you never ever need to escape a character.
Your example was probably not a real case, but I checked with my swiftkey and after “Roman” it suggested “reigns” “catholic” and “Empire”
Do you know why it wasn’t deemed a gatekeeper?
Absolutely unaccountable. Is that different where you are?
Does the law apply to Telegram the same way? If not, why not?
Just note that the comment was inaccurate, in that their weird encryption is indeed open source at least.