• ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      how is that speculation, its material; Im only interested in ideologies with proven merit.

      Im willing to take a chance of a synthesis on a new idea, but it has to actually offer people something.

      • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s speculation because you don’t know what the future holds. And just because you’re not interested in a particular ideology or don’t think it has merit doesn’t make it any less communist.

        My only point is that words do in fact have meaning, Marxist-Leninism is not synonymous with communism. Therefore, one can be anti-tankie without being anti-communist.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Orthodox Marxists” can hardly be said to exist, because the classical formulation of Marxism has long been empirically refuted, hence the need for new schools. Even Luxembourgists are more respectable than “Orthodox Marxists”.

        • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can be, but that would be called ‘idealism’ and no one outside of western liberal spheres will take you seriously.

            • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Because you only advocate for ideas that dont exist in reality, and deride actually existing marxism as ‘tankie’, you can continue to advocate for idealist positions, but it requires you to build a coherent movement around it otherwise its just masterbation and contrarianism.