That’s not a typo. Windows 96 promised to build on the success of Windows 95, yet it never materialized as originally intended.

I only learned about this a few months ago. To me, this was an incredibly fascinating discovery and wanted to write about & share it.

“The Windows That Never Was”

  • floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I was actually part of the beta test group for Windows Nashville. It was an improvement over Windows 95, but Windows 98 really brought home a lot of good UI design improvements that began in Windows Nashville. Sadly, it was so buggy that they delayed for several years and, instead, just released Windows 98 when it was finally ready.

    Windows Longhorn was a similar failure a few years later

    • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Windows Vista is Microsoft’s greatest success, because it’s main purpose was to make people forget the promises made for Longhorn.

      • tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I do kinda wish we had gotten WinFS. All the “ideas” of it seemed cool, just impossible to implement without breaking every existing application.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If Windows is (was) good at anything, it’s maintaining backwards compatibility for longer than anyone expects them to. Never mind revolutionizing their entire file system, Windows 11 is still backwards-compatible with batch files written before we had folders.

          • megabyteX@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Future Storage aka WinFS. It was a cool idea, metadata based relational db file system. But the execution was horrible, SQL Server based file system which was exposed via .NET IIRC.

            Desktop search was supposed to be revolutionized, but it was scrapped just before Vista was released

          • rigatti@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If I recall, it was a new file system. So instead if folders, every file would just kind of have tags and could be dynamically grouped like that. I could very well be wrong, but I remember being excited for it.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Longhorn… the hype was strong with that one. I don’t even remember what the hype was about, just that Longhorn was supposed to be amazing.

    • macstainless@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Wow, that’s a cool story! Thanks for sharing it! I had no clue there was even a beta test group back then. Was that outside of Microsoft?

      • floop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        No, I actually worked for Microsoft. I was 15. It was a sort of contract gig for bug hunters, especially if you were able to fix the code at all. Otherwise, you just had access to download it from Microsoft servers and submit feedback.

        Back then, these betas were tested by the Microsoft user interface group, maybe that’s where I did contractor work for Longhorn. It was a very long time ago.