• dil@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Idk, its less subjective than the top comment summaries on reddit from users

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see no reason to engage with, or trust anything created by, a bullshit generator. If Digg claims to “care” about the humans, then making the top comment into a brick wall (which has zero accountability) is a funny way of showing it.

      But then again, I’m sure their privacy policy also says they care about your privacy.

      • dil@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        its not a comment its in the post and its alpha, they’ll prob add an option for it to be closed by default.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You’re right, it’s not a comment. It supersedes comments. Digg is literally showing you an AI-first ecosystem.

          This isn’t some UI glitch. It’s a feature they stuck front and center. Digg is trying to start a second honeymoon period with users. Why do you think things would get better after that?

          • dil@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Becuase the app is in alpha lol, its janky everywhere, has no settings or customizability uet, cant even make communities yet, ill give them the benefit of the doubt that you can turn them off or auto hide them

            • LWD@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              So not only was the AI put front and center, it was also put in first?!

              I’ve looked at plenty of alpha software before, and I’ve seen plenty of incomplete features. I understand that one has to give an unfinished product leeway. But devs do not simply accidentally add a whole feature into an app. Or if this was somehow all a huge coincidental mistake, they made a massive PR blunder.

              • dil@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                summaries are a non issue, stealing other ppls work to pass of on your own is

              • dil@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Guess this particilar use of ai just isnt an issue for me, I personally have more problems with lemmys use of generative ai and hyping it up

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not like itll prevent ppl from clicking on articles that alrady werent