• vaccinationviablowdart@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is textbook gaslighting.

    Well if I spent 5 minutes instead of 0.5 minutes I might be able to find an actual text book but I think APA Dictionary of Psychology: “gaslight” is a pretty good definition:

    to manipulate another person into doubting their perceptions, experiences, or understanding of events.

    And it provides an example, from the original source of the term:

    a wife is nearly driven to insanity by the deceptions of her husband

    It is tres shitty to minimize actual abusive behavior by applying a term associated with intimate partner violence it to this minor thing which is someone posting a comment on some software he works at using an account which goes to zero effort to obfuscate that.

    In penance I decree you should watch the movie https://archive.org/details/gaslight-1944 and tell me if it’s any good, I haven’t seen it yet.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Damn skippy. Gaslighting and basic ass lying are different things. But hey, it’s trendy right now. Next, we’ll find out how he’s a malignant narcissist.

      Dude posted a shill review. It’s called shilling. It’s a form of lying for profit. He likely did it to advance his career or because he was afraid not to. His employer likely encouraged the action without directly ordering it.

    • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is the type of pedantry that annoys me and yet I admire. Bravo, good fellow, I salute you

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Its literally a false review, designed to counter the multiple negative real reviews that have been left recently. Its a false narrative designed to induce the reader into doubting the ture narrative of the other genuine reviews, or possibly even influence a potential reviewer by coloring their actual experience with the app. Definitely fits the definition you posted, even if its inconsistent with the example they gave.