I remember a time when visiting a website that opens a javacript dialog box asking for your name so the message “hi <name entered>” could be displayed was baulked at.

Why does signal want a phone number to register? Is there a better alternative?

  • Manalith@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The only thing I’ll tack onto this is that with the introduction of Signal usernames, you still have to give Signal your number to verify that at least on some level, you probably are a real person. As someone with 5 different phone numbers, probably doesn’t stop spam as much as they’d hoped, but more than they feared, but at least now you don’t have to give that Craigslist guy who uses Signal your phone number, just your username. Is that the best method? I dunno, but but it is something.

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I was unaware of this change, and it’s perfectly acceptable. No one has any ground to lambast Signal for requiring phone numbers to get an account. I think that’s a perfectly reasonable spam mitigation technique. The issue is having to shotgun your phone number to every Howard and Susan that you want to use Signal to communicate with.

      This was honestly the only thing holding me back from actually using Signal. I’ll likely register for an account now.

      • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        Spam accounts are clearly the biggest factor for not letting anyone just sign up with an email. Although getting a new email without a phone verification is getting increasingly hard now.