• mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    If you listen to the red hot chili peppers or watch a marvel movie or look at a DC comic and then go and make a song, movie, or painting inspired by the style of a certain creator that does not mean you have somehow violated those creators copyright. You don’t owe them any money because you took inspiration.

    AI training on publicly available data does not infringe on copyright even if that data is somehow copyrighted.

    And I know that many people on these kinds of platforms don’t like to hear this but the benefits of AI outweighs any potential legal issues copyright might entail.

    Moreover, and I keep pointing this out over and over, you can’t have the same information free for individuals to use and have it paid for at the same time for corporations. You have to decide if you want that information free for all or for none.

    Edit: yes yes. I know y’all don’t like these facts and yet they’re undisputed.

    • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Who’s watching marvel movies for free, legally? Who’s listening to RHCP’s entire discography for free, legally?

      Not the people training AI, they’ve been caught pirating their data multiple times.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        No one is. That’s exactly the point.

        Llms aren’t recreating copyrighted works. They’re drawing inspiration if you will. No copyright is being infringed.