Is there any downside to leaving something seeding indefinitely? Typically I just leave all my torrents seeding whenever I’m done 24/7 (whenever the VPN is on) but is there any detrimental issues to seeding too much?

It doesn’t bother me I was just curious if there was ever a such thing as too much seeding since I have like 20+ things seeding and maybe one thing downloading.

Speed isn’t an issue since I have gigabit internet.

  • RiQuY@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    If your router is the one that your ISP provided, torrenting can affect your internet connection stability by having too many connections active, because most of the time that hardware is trash (at least from my experience).

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Most (all?) torrent clients support limiting the number of active connections. This should prevent your router from being overloaded.

      In my experience 500 shouldn’t be a problem. On that note, limiting upload bandwidth to something less than the available upload bandwidth is important too.

      • black0ut@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        250 active connections is the limit with my ISP provided router. You can get beyond that, but it causes a lot of instability, and eventually, the network fails and the router reboots.

        On another note, I don’t limit my bandwidth at all and I’ve managed to get uploads/downloads of up to 142% the speed which I should get.

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          250 connections really is not much. I ran a matrix server for a while and joining a few large rooms (1k+ servers) made the connections reach a few thousand – which made the router slow down/unstable/reboot.

          I’ve noticed the same for my upload bandwitdh, with it being 170%-200% of its advertised maximum speed. Sadly the same can’t be said about the download bandwidth. Luckily fiber will be available in a few months.

          • black0ut@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah I know I should, and it’s on my list, but I haven’t changed it yet lol. I’m making it work like this and if I can stretch it until they replace it for a more capable model, that’s money that I don’t have to spend on it.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Hm, interesting. I didn’t bother with a personal router for the longest time (aside from an old Linksys I got because it works with ExpressVPN) because I have fibre optic but I might go out and look for one now.

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        One related thing to watch out for is the state table size - one of my old cheap routers back in the day showed how full it was and it was hitting 100% a lot and seemed to grind the network to a halt when it did (I was in a house of 5 young people with lots of devices and multiple people torrenting behind a cheapo Netgear running ddwrt). That’s what lead me to switch to high end or x86 based routers. Being able to see the state table stats really helps to know how likely it is to be a problem, it’s so big when using opnsense on an x86 box that I don’t think it ever goes above 1% now.

        Edit: now that I think about it, if your VPN is working I wouldn’t expect any states related to peer connections to show up since your router won’t be NATing them, I guess I was just bold back in the day because it was a huge problem then.