• TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Just as I finally see Chinese culture gaining more global cultural relevance— and it had to be in order to bypass a ban of an intrusive app.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          no, they were given the option.

          1. split into two companies
          2. close down operations in the US

          that’s pretty cut a dry they chose to end operations in the US. The US didn’t ban them.

          • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            They banned them from operating in the US (unless certain criteria which kills their company were met)

            So yes, they were banned. How daft are you?

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 minutes ago

              so when other companies that refuse to adhere to labor laws in the US move their factories to other countries, are they banned?

              • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 minutes ago

                You don’t seem to understand how this ban is being enforced, do you? Please sit down and let the adults talk.