• Radioactive Butthole@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Then it would be trivial to sign a message using his known wallet address that could be cryptographicly verified. But he is lying so he can’t.

    • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t think this guy is Satoshi but no Bitcoin wallets known to belong to Satoshi have been active since their initial transactions. I think it’s likely that the keys for those wallets have been lost. So I don’t think the inability to sign these messages proves that he’s not Satoshi, the fraud does though.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I think it’s likely that the keys for those wallets have been lost.

        I think that’s entirely possible. But I think it’s also quite likely that those wallets are intentionally being left alone. I think there are legitimate fears that revealing the identity of Satoshi would destabilize the Bitcoin economy (as well as make that person a serious target). Personally, if I were Satoshi, I would try to keep my identity secret.

        Also, if you were to ask me, i’d say that this guy isn’t Satoshi because in all likelihood, Satoshi is Nick Szabo.

        • firebyte@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ve often heard about these legitimate fears, though why would revealing Satoshi’s real identity destabilise the bitcoin economy/make him a target?

          Genuinely unsure.