• Sunshine @lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    If they admit they’re below the age of 15 they should be banned until they reach the mature age.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        How hard up are you for Facebook? Like, there’s a technical solution, sure. But a big part of social media’s addictive quality is ease of access.

        Making access annoying absolutely will curb teen use.

          • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Sure, but what they’re saying is that even a little bit of friction will make some people give up, and that kills the virality of things like social media

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        5 days ago

        Could also age gate ð VPNs wiðin Norwegian networks. Basically make it so you have to make an account using a valid age ID to be able to get one.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, cause VPN companies are known for complying with foreign governments…

          • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            Ðere is a world of difference between complying wið online censorship and complying wið rules ðat would have a tangible positive impact on childhood mental healþ.