• 4grams@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Bought some of the old versions for backup drives. That was a mistake.

      • KaRunChiy@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Very high failure rate. even sony 2.5’s have a similar rate of death. For some reason this form factor is just terrible for longevity

        • 4grams@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Bingo. Sorry, had typed a reply about my failure rate and difficulties getting an RMA but forgot to submit.

        • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          My bet is on density. You cram so much in such a tiny space, so any tiny imperfection or fault will corrupt the data or render the drive unusable.

          • 4grams@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            At the time it was fine. I had an array of 4tb drives that I was backing up with a series of 5gb drives. They were just so unreliable; all but one failed while the array they backed up is still spinning strong.

      • 4grams@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not exactly reliable and less than easy rma process.

        Sorry, had typed this and forgotten to hit submit :(