• Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    in one of the WAN shows he went on a big handwringing tirade about how “unions means I’m a failure as an employer” with undertones of “You wouldnt want to make me a failure by unionizing, right?”

    • TheWorstMailman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Okay. So I’m not missing something. I guess I heard him say that it “would be a personal failure for him as an employer” as him taking personal responsibility for his employees’ treatment. A charitable interpretation, but just a difference of opinion.

      I can see how people can interpret what he says as soft anti-union, it’s just weird to see you and others say things like this as if he’s sober sort of Robber Baron.

      Edit: I’m not going to double down. This was a blind spot for me, maybe because my union is already established and fairly strong, but I’ll hold this L and learn from it

      • SRo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are a union man? Go speak with your fellow union people who work with negotiations and forming chapters and ask them what it means when a company says “we are pro unions but we feel it isn’t a good fit for us and we would have failed as a company if our employees would feel like they would need one”.

        Hint: it’s something like “get the fuck out with the union shit, I’ll fire y’all”

        • TheWorstMailman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair enough. I’m not going to double down. This was a blind spot for me, maybe because my union is already established and fairly strong, but I’ll hold this L and learn from it

          • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would just like to give props to you for owning up and listening to the information. I do not in any way think that you were wrong in your reasoning, just that there was more context that is likely relevant which you hadn’t been privy to, and once you were informed of it you reevaluated. Not everyone does that and I think a very valuable part of this community is when people do that (I know I’m not always particularly good at it myself).